The HBS hosts discuss academic specializations and how to make the humanities more inclusive.
Over the last several decades, there has been a long-overdue push for professors in the humanities to diversify their curricula to include more women, BIPOC, queer, disabled, and other under-represented thinkers and texts. Yet, theh "add diversity and stir" model for syllabus design in many ways failsย to address a lot of the problems that motivated this demand in the first place. It isn't just syllabi in the humanities that have a diversity problem. It's the humanities professoriate itself.
First, academics from traditionally dominant demographic groups-- white, make, straight, non-disabled, and middle-to-upper class-- ought not presume that their academic training has necessarily equipped them with the knowledge, skills, or understanding to simply "take up" an unfamiliar field of specialization with the same level of knowledge, skill, and understanding as a specialist in that area possesses. Second, pressuring the current professoriate to "add diversity and stir" tends to de-emphasize the need for universities and individual departments to hire faculty from traditionally under-represented demographics withย specializedย trainingย in the needed areas. BUT... third, we must also be careful not to assume that every person's scholarly specialization mirrors their personal identity.
How can we think about strategies for diversifying both the curricula and the faculty in humanities fields without reproducing the same prejudices that have made the humanities so non-diverse?
Full episode notes available at this link. You can listen to Episode 24 below:
In American graphic fiction and contemporary film, the superhero stands at the center of many popular narratives. Superhero stories published by DC Comics and Marvel are a multi-million dollar per year industry and, in 2019 alone, superhero movies grossed 3.19 billionย dollars in revenue. Although it may seem to the novice as if these publishing houses and film studios just recycle the same stories (and sequels) over and over, connoisseurs of the genre know that the figure of the "superhero' has changed and evolved dramatically over the last half-century. What does the figure of the superhero represent? Who does it serve? How has it adapted to reflect broader culteral, political, and social change?
In this episode, Dr. Charles F. Peterson-- and bona fideย connoisseur of comics and superhero films-- schools his novice co-hosts on the nuances of superheroes and their development, as well as the deep and often profound philosophical truths that the figure of the superhero helps to reveal about us ordinary (not super and no heroic) humans.ย
Full episode notes available at this link. You can listen to Episode 23 below.
For Episode 17, I am joined by Dr. Charles Mills to talk about punishment, non-ideal theories of justice, why philosophers love science fiction, and "White Bear" (Season 2, Episode 2 of Black Mirror), which first premiered in 2013.