Login
Well here we are, halfway through the year! I’m composing this at lunchtime on Monday, as Hannah and I went away last night after our son’s debut for his new basketball team. They absolutely destroyed the other team in a friendly, and he scored a 3-pointer on the final buzzer, which was pretty special.
The reason we went away was ostensibly it being 21 years tomorrow since I proposed to her on Prince Edward Island in Canada. That was half a lifetime ago for both of us, and we have fond memories. It’s also two years tomorrow since her mum died, so there’s sadness mixed in there too.
The kids stayed with my parents for the first time in a year. Our son doesn’t really need babysitting as he’s 16, but it’s only fair that he goes along with our 12 year-old daughter. It seems they had a good time. Hannah and I certainly did, basically replicating what we did last time we went away: getting an upgrade at the Crowne Plaza and going for dinner and cocktails at Khai Khai.
Last week, my son started doing some work for WAO, ensuring that we have transcripts for all of our podcast episodes. He’s doing a good job so far. We’re recording another couple of episodes today for Season 7, with Laura currently releasing episodes of Season 6 we recorded over the last couple of months.
I started doing some user research for the workers.coop around Member Learning group. We’re following-up on responses to a survey which asked people for their learning preferences, etc. so that we can create targeted, relevant offerings. In related news, I updated a consent form for Bonfire user research, taking into account Hannah’s feedback (she’s a user researcher for NHS England).
WEAll, one of our clients, decided against using Hylo after testing it in May. This was mainly based on our recommendation due to the lack of effective moderation tools. Now, they’re planning to test Discourse, which is a much better option. So John and I were scoping that out.
Anne’s still finishing off her dissertation and final year of uni work, but she’s rejoined us for a couple of days per week. This is good as she’s very organised (not that the rest of us aren’t!) and brings a different angle and energy to our work, particularly with Participate.
In other news, we’ve had more house viewings but no offers yet. Everyone’s expressed how lovely they think it is, but I guess the housing market is a little slow at the moment. I just hope we don’t miss out on the place we want to move to.
This week is the last one of a crazy few weeks of football trials for my daughter. She was offered a place at Sunderland’s ETC with the final trial for Newcastle’s ETC being on Friday. It’s her choice, but I’m keen for her to join the former as she’ll be mixed with girls a year up, and it’s a more established setup. She was in Newcastle’s ETC this last season, and if she’s offered a place and opts to stay there it’s no bad thing.
So this week I’ll be continuing with client work, doing a bit of business development for September, and considering whether to respond to UNESCO’s call for contributions r.e. the definition of algorithm literacy and data literacy. It’s a tight deadline, but Ian O’Byrne and Tom Salmon have expressed an interest in collaborating, so we’ll see. Ideally, I would have read Kate Crawford’s Atlas of AI this weekend, but… I didn’t.
The post Weeknote 26/2023 first appeared on Open Thinkering.I spent much of this weekend digging in on some Electrohome G07 monitor chassis repair. I have a bunch of games in the bavacade that use this monitor chassis to power the glorious CRT tubes for these 1980s miracles.
Image of G07 chassis with yoke connector
All told I have at least 7 cabinets that have a G07 chassis. There may be more, but I’m not sure what chassis all my cocktails are using given I never checked, and there are four total: Rally-X, Pleaides, Galaxian, and Moon Cresta.* Along with the Wells Gardner K4600 (at least 6 cabinets have this chassis) the G07 is the most common in the bavacade. That means part of making this hobby sustainable is figuring out how to work on these models given chassis repairs are a big part of keeping games online. I’ve slowly been getting better, but I remain very much an amateur. But even hacks like me have their moments, and this week was one of them. I got two of the three non-working G07s running again, leaving me with just one non-working chassis that I can use as a donor chassis for parts given all the games with G07s are now fully operational. YES!
More detailed image of a G07 chassis
Trusting the process means a lot of troubleshooting, and this weekend I was pretty happy to have committed a bit more and pushing myself to do more extensive diagnostic testing of the various components for things like resistance readings, diode readings, checking if transistors are good, voltage test points, etc. All of this was Greek to me just a couple of years ago, so starting to get my head around this basic troubleshooting before replacing anything is long overdue and pretty rewarding.
The multimeter has proven to be the most indispensable tool of them all
I already talked about the first successful G07 repair this week in my “bavacade Repair log from 6-29-2023,” noting “I was able to repair the Condor G07 chassis that was dead by doing a cap kit, swapping out a new B+ filter cap as well as a horizontal width coil.” The cap kit was done almost a year ago, but I never got it working. Turns out the recent replacement of the B+ filter cap is what brought it back to life. The horizontal width coil was broken, so I soldered a newer one off one of the other two non-working G07 chassis, figuring better to replace the broken one while the board was out. When I re-installed the chassis in Condor it worked, but there was a slight undulation that was annoying me. So, as a test, I tried it in Robotron and the waviness was gone and it worked perfectly, so that’s where it lives right now.
This means I needed to repair one of the other two chassis for Condor, and then I was golden. The two G07 chassis I had both blew the F901 fuses (2.25 AMP @ 250V ) next to the B+ capacitor, which is the biggest capacitor on the board. After discharging the B+ filter,† I replaced the fuses, which needed to be soldered in, and then tested the G07 that came from Pole Position (I defaulted to this one because I had desoldered the horizontal width coil from the other chassis for the first fix). Initially I thought the Pole Position chassis had an issue with the flyback and/or the horizontal output transistor (HOT) given the symptoms when it originally occurred a few weeks back. But after re-soldering the fuse and re-installing in Robotron to confirm as much, there was a total vertical collapse of the heart
G07 chassis with vertical collapse
That’s a new one, but I’ve read about it on forum posts innumerable times. I figured I’d have to deal with it sooner or later, so I embraced the challenge to broaden my experience—learning is painful! OK, so the first thing I did was look at some of the basic troubleshooting for this, and from what I read it is possibly linked to a few different things, such as an open circuit somewhere, which requires testing each resistor in the 400 series circuit to ensure there are no infinite (OL) ohm readings. It’s also been linked to the x401 and/or X402 trasnsitors, so you wanna check the values there. I’ve read a few cases where the IC501 chip was bad and needs to be replaced, but that seems less likely. That said, the following G07 repair video did have that issue, and it does a great job walking you through common troubleshooting as well as demonstrating how to test the transistors, which was very helpful:
I tested the transistors, and they were both reading at .570, which seems normal. I then tested all the 400 series resistors and some were lower than the specs, but none were open, so not sure they are the issue. I also compared the results on a working G07 and they were fairly similar, here are the results I got for this chassis:
FR401: 69 Ohm
R401: 99 Ohm
R402: 18K Ohm
R403: 3.3K Ohm
R404: 4K Ohm
R405: 12K Ohm
R406: Vertical linearity trim pot
R407: 4.2K Ohm
R408: vertical Height trim pot
R409: 51 Ohm
R410: 6.4 Ohm
R411: 13K Ohm
R412: 13.5K Ohm
R413: 580 Ohm
R414: 3.1K Ohm
R415: 2.6K Ohm
R416: 8K Ohm
R417: 67 Ohm
R418: 1.3K Ohm
R419: 1.9K Ohm
R420: 6.6 Ohm
R421: 5.5K Ohm
R423: 2.4 K Ohm
Some of the readings are low, particularly for R404, R411, R412, R416, R417,R421, and R423, but I got similar low values for another chassis that works just fine, so I “resisted” replacing any resistors just yet given I didn’t find any open circuits, just issues with value range (assuming a low resistor value would not cause the total collapse, but I’m not positive on this). The next test would be the IC501 chip, but I was not entirely sure how to test this chip, still a blindspot for me, and I don’t have a spare regardless, so I let that sit.
There could also be an issue with soldering joints at the yoke connectors on the board but the solder was fine, but still might reflow those. Beyond that, I tested the resistors for R406 and R408 which adjust the vertical height and linearity, and they adjusting values accordingly, so I was hitting a brick wall. I even checked the diodes in the 400 circuit, but all seemed good.
The dark splotch on the flyback is where it burst and started leaking
At this point I decided to step away from the Pole Position chassis, and turn to the other one that wasn’t working. First thing was desolder the horizontal width coil from the chassis I just abandoned and solder it to this one. I already added the new F901 fuse, so with the width coil added and the fuse in I tested it out. The last time it had not powered on at all, whereas this time it powered on and immediately there was smoke coming out of the flyback. It had blown. This, oddly, was very reassuring because at least I knew exactly where the issue was, and I also had an extra flyback that worked. So, I replaced the flyback and tested the game again and voilà this time it worked perfectly, whew! All the work on the other one with no results but a lot of learning, and this one was a simple replacement part swap, I’ll take it every time.
I need another width coil and a working flyback, but once I have them I might even take another shot at the last non-working G07, but given no games are effected I can finally move on to the last chassis repair I need to do, the K4600 for the Centuri Challenger, so until then!
_____________________________________
*I’ve yet to dismantle a cocktail cabinet, but that task will probably be coming soon given some work needed on my Pleiades cocktail cabinet, I don’t trust the adjustable metal legs on that game and want to get them properly lubricated and adjust with the write screws.
† Capacitors are designed to hold a charge, and when you blow the F901 fuse that charge has nowhere to go, which makes these big capacitor dangerous to the touch. Whenever removing this board do not grab it from underneath before discharging the G07 cap. You can do this by using an insulated screw driver that is connected to a ground via an alligator clip to ensure the charge has somewhere to go. To ground it, make sure the screw driver touches the + and – posts, read more on this on the KLOV forums here.
The moving adventure continues. Let's see…
We were in Dubois PA for a night (and I ran in the morning). We were in a hotel in Parsippany-Troy Hills NJ for two nights (and I ran one morning). That stop allowed us to unhitch the trailer and drive into the city to pick up the apartment key (and drop off a few things). Then we drove north to North Hampton NH (with the trailer) and stayed a night. I didn't plan to run, but there was a donut shop across the street so I put on my running shoes to go the third of a mile to get a half-dozen on the morning we left. From there we drove to Blue Hill ME where we've been since midday Friday, still in the trailer but "boondocking" (and I've run twice).
Saturday was my nephew's 17th birthday and we held a joint part for him and my mom, who turns 80 later this month. We'd initially planned a family excursion to Zion, but what with the move, we had to cancel that.
Food highlights include the charcuterie boards that my niece made for the party (she had me make the salami roses); the porky fig toast at Throwback Brewery in NH; and the lobster roll at the Bagaduce Lunch.
Other random updates: I've started taking the "Running Resiliency" course from Greg Lehman (although I haven't touched the materials since I got to Maine); I have absolutely no idea what day of the week it is most of the time — that's good and bad (I posted this past week's Second Breakfast essay a day early); I realized that I need to get a different GPS app for when we're pulling the RV here in New England as there are a helluva lot of low bridges and Ye Olde Google Maps does not help you navigate such things. And finally: according to my Garmin Watch, my HRV is very low and my body is "strained." Um, yeah.
This week is finally move-in week, but not 'til Thursday. So the strain will not be gone anytime soon.
I usually send out my newsletter at the end of each month. It’s just a collection of the posts published that month (you should subscribe if for some reason you don’t check this site every day). I thought it would be nice maybe to start each newsletter with some personal introduction of what has taken place over the month, and hey, I may as well make that a blog post. So here are some highlights and thoughts from June.
I went to the EDEN conference in Dublin, with Maren who was keynoting. Although I’ve been to a couple of conferences since lockdown, this was the first time meeting lots of international people who I hadn’t seen since the before times. It was a fun conference, lots of good talks, and well organised. I still feel as though my conference stamina is underdeveloped compared to pre-pandemic – it’s all that talking to people. And I’m not entirely sure I want to get back to that level either. Two or three a year seems a nice level now.
We gained a further round of GO-GN funding this month from the Hewlett Foundation, which is great news. This remains the best project I’ve worked on, and this year we celebrate 10 years since its founding.
I read 10 books this month, the pick of them was Fingers Crossed by Miki Berenyi (of 90s shoegaze group Lush). Her childhood is pretty messed up, and her account of the sexism of the music industry (particularly Brit pop) is scathing, but she tells it all with a dry sense of humour. After reading some male rock biographies, which think tales of blocking up toilets and hanging out with groupies are way more entertaining than they actually are, this was a refreshing entry in the rock biography genre.
It was also a delight to see Audrey Watters return with a Substack newsletter, Second Breakfast. I’ve paid up for a year, and it’s already a treat to have it ping into my inbox. I’ve missed her writing and insight.
AI angst continues to dominate much of the ed tech and beyond discourse. I’ve been in meetings at the OU where it is nothing short of outright panic, reminiscent of this scene:
Stay calm everyone.
In the competitive world of business, the ability to present a compelling business proposal is paramount to success. Whether you’re vying for a new client, seeking investment, or aiming to secure a partnership, a well-crafted proposal can make all the difference. In this comprehensive guide, we’ll take you through the process of creating an impactful business proposal, step by step. We’ll explore what a business proposal entails, discuss its important elements, and show you how Prezi, an innovative presentation platform, can help you create an engaging business proposal that leaves a lasting impression.
To begin, let’s establish a clear understanding of what is a business proposal and why it holds significant value. A business proposal is a formal document that outlines a solution to a client’s problem or presents a business opportunity. Its primary objective is to persuade the recipient to take a specific action, such as approving a project or entering into a partnership. By effectively conveying your ideas, expertise, and value proposition, a business proposal can help you win lucrative contracts and drive business growth.
A business proposal serves as a powerful tool for establishing credibility and showcasing your capabilities. It enables you to communicate your understanding of the client’s needs, propose a tailored solution, and demonstrate how your offerings can address their pain points. Additionally, a well-crafted business proposal showcases your professionalism, attention to detail, and commitment to delivering exceptional results. It sets you apart from competitors and positions you as a trusted partner in achieving your client’s objectives.
A well-structured business proposal consists of several essential components that work together to create a persuasive narrative. Understanding and effectively incorporating these elements can significantly enhance the impact of your proposal. In order to understand how to write a business proposal you need to understand all areas, so let’s explore each component in detail.
The executive summary is a vital part of a business proposal, providing a concise overview that captures the reader’s attention. It highlights key points and conveys the unique value proposition of your proposal. To make it compelling, clearly showcase the benefits and advantages your proposal offers, addressing the client’s specific needs. Keep the summary concise, well-structured, and organized to ensure a quick understanding.
Prezi’s dynamic presentation features can enhance the impact of your summary in a presentation format with captivating visuals and effects like zooming and panning. Incorporating interactive elements and embedding videos or clickable links can further engage the reader. Crafting a strong executive summary, leveraging Prezi’s tools, sets the stage for a successful business proposal presentation.
To craft a compelling business proposal, it’s essential to articulate the client’s pain points and challenges clearly. This showcases your understanding of their needs and positions you as the ideal solution provider. Thorough research and analysis of their industry and competitors will provide valuable insights to tailor your proposal effectively. Be specific and provide examples that resonate with their situation, emphasizing the potential impact on their business. Outline your proposed solutions and explain how they address their pain points, showcasing your expertise and past successes. By effectively articulating the client’s challenges and demonstrating your understanding, you build trust and establish yourself as the preferred partner. This strengthens the overall impact and persuasiveness of your business proposal.
When presenting your proposed solutions, it’s crucial to convey them clearly and in a structured manner. Begin by clearly outlining the precise actions you’ll take to tackle the client’s challenges and help them achieve their desired goals. Break down the process into manageable phases or milestones, highlighting the key actions and deliverables at each stage. Clearly articulate the benefits and advantages of your approach, explaining how it uniquely positions the client for success. Focus on the value your solutions bring, whether it’s increased efficiency, cost savings, improved productivity, or any other relevant benefits. By emphasizing the positive impact of your approach, you make a compelling case for why the client should choose your proposal over others.
When creating your business proposal, you need to ensure the timeline is realistic. This not only demonstrates your ability to meet deadlines but also highlights your efficient project management skills. By clearly outlining the key milestones and deliverables, you show the client that you understand the project’s scope and have the necessary resources to ensure timely delivery. Transparency and effective project management are highly regarded in the business world, and by emphasizing these qualities, you build trust with the client.
Meeting deadlines is crucial, and by showcasing your track record of timely completion, you position yourself as a reliable and dependable partner for their project requirements. Your commitment to delivering on time speaks volumes about your professionalism and dedication to client satisfaction.
When presenting your business proposal, it’s crucial to introduce your team members and emphasize their relevant experience and expertise. This not only establishes credibility but also builds trust with the client. By showcasing the qualifications and capabilities of your team, you reassure the client that you have the necessary resources to successfully execute the proposed project.
Highlighting their expertise in relevant areas demonstrates your commitment to delivering high-quality results. It also instills confidence in the client that they are partnering with a knowledgeable and skilled team capable of overcoming challenges and achieving desired outcomes. Introducing your team members adds a personal touch to the proposal, allowing the client to connect with the individuals who’ll be involved in their project. This human element fosters a sense of collaboration and increases the client’s confidence in your ability to meet their needs effectively.
To establish trust and foster transparency, it’s essential to clearly communicate the cost of your services in your business proposal. Provide a detailed breakdown of pricing, including any available packages or options that align with the client’s specific needs. By being transparent about the financial aspect, you demonstrate your professionalism and commitment to open communication.
Additionally, it’s crucial to outline the payment terms, such as deposit requirements and invoicing schedules. We’ll clearly state the upfront deposit amount, timing, and the frequency and method of invoicing for your convenience and peace of mind. This level of clarity ensures that both parties are on the same page regarding financial expectations and facilitates a smooth and mutually beneficial working relationship. By addressing the cost of services and payment terms in a transparent manner, you instill confidence in the client, showcasing your reliability and commitment to fair business practices.
Including testimonials or case studies from satisfied clients is a great way to show off your track record of successful projects. It’s like having happy customers vouch for you and share their positive experiences.
When potential clients see these testimonials, it gives them reassurance and confidence in your abilities. They can see that you’ve helped others just like them and delivered outstanding results. It’s real proof that you’re reliable, trustworthy, and capable of meeting their needs. These success stories are like a seal of approval, demonstrating your expertise and commitment to delivering excellent service. By sharing these testimonials you’re letting your satisfied clients do the talking for you.
Now that we understand the key components of a business proposal, let’s dive into the step-by-step process of creating an impactful proposal.
In order to write an effective business proposal, start by conducting thorough research and analysis of your client’s industry, market trends, and competitors. Dive deep into their specific needs and pain points to gain valuable insights that’ll allow you to tailor your proposal accordingly. By demonstrating a comprehensive understanding of their business landscape, you can showcase your expertise and position yourself as the ideal solution provider.
Clearly defining the objectives of your business proposal is crucial. Determine whether you aim to win a new client, secure funding, or initiate a strategic partnership. Aligning your proposal with these objectives ensures its relevance and effectiveness. By explicitly stating your goals, you can craft a persuasive proposal that directly addresses the needs and desires of your target audience.
When structuring your business proposal, consider the appropriate format and layout. While there are no strict rules, a well-organized and visually appealing design significantly enhances readability and engagement. Break down your proposal into clear sections with headings, use bullet points and subheadings for easy navigation, and incorporate visuals or infographics to convey information effectively. By presenting a professional and polished document, you create a positive impression and increase the chances of capturing the reader’s attention.
One size does not fit all when it comes to business proposals. Tailor each proposal to address the unique needs and challenges of your clients. Personalize the content by referencing their specific situation, pain points, and goals. By showcasing your understanding of their individual requirements, you demonstrate a genuine interest in their success. This personalized approach sets you apart from generic proposals and builds a strong connection with the client, increasing the likelihood of a positive response.
Invest time and effort into crafting a compelling executive summary for your business proposal. This concise section serves as the gateway to your proposal, capturing the reader’s attention from the outset. Summarize the key points of your proposal in a clear and impactful manner. Highlight the unique value you bring and emphasize the benefits the client will gain by choosing your solution. A compelling executive summary entices the reader to explore the proposal further and sets a positive tone for the rest of the document.
Effectively articulate the pain points and challenges faced by the client in a clear and concise manner. Show your understanding of their specific situation and make them feel heard and understood. By accurately identifying and addressing their problems, you establish credibility and build trust. This clear problem statement lays the foundation for presenting compelling solutions that directly tackle the client’s concerns.
Present your proposed solutions in a logical and persuasive manner. Outline the specific steps you’ll take to address the client’s challenges and explain how your approach will deliver tangible results. Use persuasive language to highlight the benefits and advantages of your solutions. Incorporate relevant case studies or examples to demonstrate your track record of success with examples of previous business proposals. By presenting a well-structured and compelling plan, you instill confidence in the client and increase the likelihood of them choosing your proposal.
Highlight the expertise and experience of your team members that are relevant to the proposal. Provide brief biographies or profiles of key individuals, showcasing their qualifications and accomplishments. This establishes credibility and demonstrates that you have the necessary knowledge and skills to execute the proposed project successfully. By showcasing your team’s expertise, you instill confidence in the client and differentiate yourself from competitors. Clients are more likely to trust and engage with a proposal backed by a team of capable professionals.
When crafting your business proposal, don’t underestimate the power of visual aids in capturing attention and delivering your message with impact. Incorporating charts, graphs, and infographics strategically throughout your proposal can make complex information more accessible, memorable, and engaging. By leveraging visual representations, you enhance the clarity of your ideas and increase the chances of resonating with your audience.
Visual elements act as persuasive tools, helping you illustrate the value and potential of your proposal in a compelling way. They provide a visual framework that supports your written content and makes it more compelling. Whether you’re presenting data, illustrating processes, or showcasing benefits, visual aids serve as a powerful complement to your narrative, making your proposal more compelling and persuasive (view the Prezi presentation example below).
Remember to keep your visuals clean, organized, and aligned with your brand. Choose colors, fonts, and imagery that reflect your professional image and enhance the overall aesthetics of your proposal. By embracing visual communication, you not only make your business proposal visually appealing but also increase its chances of standing out and leaving a lasting impression.
Before you finalize and submit your business proposal, invest time in meticulously proofreading and polishing its content. Take a thorough look at the entire document to identify and rectify any grammar, spelling, or formatting errors. Ensuring a consistent tone, style, and formatting throughout is crucial for presenting a polished and professional proposal.
Proofreading goes beyond error correction; it helps you refine your message and ensure clarity and coherence. Use this opportunity to enhance sentence structures, rephrase complex ideas, and improve overall readability. Carefully evaluate the flow and logical progression of your proposal, making necessary adjustments to enhance its effectiveness.
Polishing your business proposal involves fine-tuning the language and presentation to make a lasting impact. Pay attention to word choice, sentence structure, and writing style, aiming for concise and precise communication. Remove any redundant or ambiguous content and ensure each section contributes meaningfully to your proposal’s objectives.
Also, make sure to watch a video on creating a business proposal presentation, where we cover 5 key steps in crafting an impactful presentation for success:
When it comes to presenting your business proposal, engaging visuals and seamless delivery can make a significant impact. Prezi, an innovative presentation platform, offers a range of features and tools that can elevate your business proposal presentations to new heights.
In a business proposal presentation, leverage the dynamic and non-linear capabilities of Prezi to captivate potential investors and stakeholders, showcasing your ideas with immersive zooming and panning effects that leave a lasting impression.
Prezi will allow you to break free from the constraints of traditional slide decks, enabling you to think beyond linear narratives and instead craft a visual journey that seamlessly flows from one idea to another. By zooming in and out, panning across the canvas, and navigating through a virtual space, Prezi adds a new dynamic dimension, making your business proposal presentation more engaging, memorable, and impactful.
When preparing your proposal presentation, consider incorporating a variety of interactive elements to elevate audience engagement and create a truly immersive and memorable experience. By seamlessly integrating videos that showcase your product or service, embedding clickable links to additional resources or relevant websites, and incorporating interactive charts that allow viewers to explore data in real-time, you can effectively communicate your ideas and capture the attention of your audience in a way that leaves a lasting impact. These interactive elements not only enhance the overall visual appeal of your presentation but also provide an opportunity for your audience to actively participate, interact with the content, and gain a deeper understanding of the value proposition you are offering.
With Prezi’s collaborative features, you can streamline the process of creating a proposal presentation by seamlessly working together with your team members. Gone are the days of sending multiple versions of the presentation back and forth via email; instead, Prezi enables multiple contributors to work simultaneously on the same presentation, fostering efficient teamwork and saving valuable time.
By leveraging Prezi’s real-time collaboration tools, team members can collaborate on different aspects of the proposal presentation, making edits, adding content, and refining the overall message concurrently. This collaborative environment encourages creativity, idea sharing, and collective input, resulting in a more comprehensive and polished final presentation.
Once your team has finalized the proposal presentation, Prezi makes it incredibly easy to share your work with clients or stakeholders for review and feedback. With just a few clicks, you can securely share a link to your presentation, allowing others to access and view it from any device or location. This streamlined sharing process ensures that your audience can conveniently review the proposal at their convenience, eliminating the need for cumbersome file transfers or scheduling multiple meetings.
Creating a business proposal presentation from scratch can be made easy with the correct tools. To simplify the process and ensure a professional presentation, utilizing templates can be a game-changer. With the help of Prezi, an innovative platform offering a wide range of templates, you can effortlessly create impressive business proposal presentations that capture attention and showcase your ideas effectively.
A business proposal template serves as a framework for organizing your content and guiding the overall structure of your proposal. It saves you valuable time by providing a pre-designed layout that incorporates essential sections. By using a template, you can focus on customizing the content to suit your specific needs rather than starting from scratch.
Prezi offers a diverse collection of business presentation templates, catering to various industries and business requirements. These templates are professionally designed, visually appealing, and customizable, allowing you to make them your own with ease.
Using a business proposal presentation template not only saves time but also ensures consistency and professionalism throughout your proposal. The templates are designed with attention to detail, incorporating best practices for layout, typography, and visual elements. This consistency enhances the readability and cohesiveness of your proposal, leaving a positive impression on your audience.
With Prezi, you have the flexibility to customize any template to suit your unique brand identity. You can easily modify colors, fonts, and images to reflect your company’s visual style and create a cohesive presentation. This personalization adds a touch of professionalism and uniqueness to your proposal, making it stand out from generic, cookie-cutter proposal presentations.
With Prezi business presentation templates and editing tools, you can confidently create professional and visually stunning proposals that leave a lasting impression.
Crafting an outstanding business proposal requires careful planning, strategic thinking, and effective communication. By following this step-by-step guide and leveraging the power of Prezi, you can create business proposals and business proposal presentations that capture attention, differentiate you from competitors, and increase your chances of success. Remember, a well-crafted proposal is a powerful tool to convey your expertise, showcase your value, and win over clients. Embrace the possibilities offered by Prezi and take your business proposals to new heights. Start creating impactful proposals today and open doors to exciting opportunities in the world of business.
I feel a bit behind the curve in writing about Reclaim Open, but I suppose it’s better late than never. We’re still technically in June, meaning the in-person event was just earlier this month, and we still have the online recap coming throughout the month of July, so perhaps my tardiness may be forgiven!
Reclaim Open is Reclaim Hosting’s 4th biennial conference following Domains17, Domains19, and OERxDomains21. It can be easy to compare each conference to those preceding it, but if there’s one thing I’ve learned while hosting these through the years, it’s that each event captures a moment in time and creates a space for connection– however it may be needed or defined in that moment by each participant– and they’re all uniquely special. In some ways these conferences snowball and build over time; we take the lessons that we learn from one and embed them into the next one. In other ways, each conference is its own entity where a distinctive group of folks will converge, share ideas and inspire, and then part ways again. The conversations are always different, but the goal (at least for me when planning) is always the same: to create a space where folks feel comfortable to share, challenge, and build alongside each other.
OERxDomains21 came at a time during covid where connection and professional support felt more difficult to come by. That event was collaborative, powerful, and pushed boundaries – all while being completely online. Domains 17 & 19 were equally powerful, and reinforced art & creativity by taking place in various museum hotels (penguins & tv stack installations included).
While there were no penguins this go around, Reclaim Open was no different in how it carved out space for a community to join forces. In many ways, this conference felt like a reunion, celebration, and call to action all in one. The conference themes were perfect for this:
In April 1993, Tim Berners Lee open sourced the World Wide Web, and the ensuing decades of internet technologies bears the mark of that historic moment. Thirty years later, open source still remains central to building and providing an open web. For our 4th biennial conference, Reclaim Hosting plans to not only celebrate the history of the open web, but take stock of the present moment while exploring the future of Open. To this end we established 3 distinct, though always related, tracks wherein we asked folks to share their work around the past, present, and future of the open web. It was so fun to head back where it all began, and we had a blast welcoming web historians, creative tinkerers, digital humanists, instructional technologists, project admins, and open source advocates to Fredericksburg, Virginia on June 5-7, 2023.
Excerpt on reclaimopen.com
The past, the present, the future: going back to where it all began in Fredericksburg, VA and sharing stories with old and new friends; a celebration of how far we’ve come, marking Reclaim’s 10th year in business and the anniversary of the open web; dreaming up where we want to be and how the future of the web will shape that path.
Each time we dream up, plan for, and host an event like this, I always re-learn just how much work goes into hosting a conference and I have so much respect and admiration for folks that do this more regularly. Coordination for the logistics alone are no joke, and we added a bit of complexity this year by recording sessions, live-streaming and experimenting with Hybrid, and producing an on-the-fly documentary. These extra elements would not have been possible without the amazing Dream Team, and it was such an honor to work alongside them these past few weeks/months (years!) to make it happen.
In no particular order, here’s a list of some of my Reclaim Open highlights:
The Reclaim team dinner after the event where we talked about the future of green web hosting, inspired by Bryan Alexander‘s keynote, What might the web become in its next generation?
Unveiling the documentary, and hearing the impromptu, round-robin experiences from conference goers at the end of day 3.
Checking out Reclaim Arcade. Still so in awe with how that space has transformed, and that evening was a blast!
The way that Rajiv Jhangiani used storytelling and visual/audio aids in his keynote, Accept all cookies and continue: The many presents of the web.
I was really interested in juxtaposing elements of “old” with our techy, future-driven web conference as a way of thinking about how the past and future can intersect. It was fun to loosely play with this using color on the website, which was black & white until the week of the conference.
I also really enjoyed creating the conference programs, which ended up sitting somewhere between a newspaper and a zine.
The programs were created using Newspaper Club and their provided Canva template for the Digital Mini Magazine. I really love how these came together in the end, along with the other stickers and t-shirts we had on hand to showcase Bryan Mathers‘ fantastic artwork:
And because I’m always curious what folks use for other conferences… the name tags were created and printed using Conference Badge and the lanyards were purchased in bulk on Amazon. Stickers were printed through Sticker Mule, which we’ve used for years, and our collection of Reclaim Open t-shirts were designed and printed through Spreadshop on shop.reclaimhosting.com.
Back to the list of highlights– I loved the casual nature of the Unconference. The slower pace on day 1 felt like a great way to kick off the event.
Hanging in downtown Fredericksburg again and eating all the Benny’s pizza I could manage.
The power of A.I. Levine
And last, but certainly not least, I really loved witnessing other Reclaimers run the show. This was a true team effort and I’m so glad to have been a part of it.
Last month on the blog, I floated the idea of thinking about generative AI tools like ChatGPT, Bing, and Bard as technologies for learning. I drew an analogy to the digital camera I used as I learned photography. As I was developing a conceptual understanding of photography, I was also learning how to use the tool in my hands, with all its knobs and buttons, and these two kinds of learning informed and supported each other. Could we use generative AI tools in a similar fashion, teaching students to use the tools well as part of learning other skills, like writing and researching? If so, it might help to know what kind of tools we’re dealing with when we talk about ChatGPT and other AI text generation tools.
For instance, I saw this post by Simon Harris go around Mastodon a couple of weeks ago:
15yo: I use ChatGPT quite a bit.
Me: Oh?
15yo: Today, I asked it to give me the last digit of Pi.
Me:
15yo: …exactly
Me:
15yo: Apparently, it’s 4
This is funny because ChatGPT is so, so wrong about pi. As an irrational number, pi has a nonterminating decimal representation; there’s no last digit of pi. The joke, however, relies on an assumption that ChatGPT is supposed to be some kind of answer machine, a tool for answering questions correctly. However, ChatGPT is famously not that. It’s well known for “hallucinating” facts and inventing citations. There are, in fact, a lot of educators who are worried that students will rely too much on ChatGPT and similar tools because these tools produce text that is factually incorrect. For example, check out this YouTube video of a chemistry instructor evaluating the accuracy of ChatGPT’s answers to various organic chemistry questions. Spoiler: It didn’t do that great.
So if these tools aren’t answer machines, what are they? I would argue that ChatGPT and similar tools are actually wordsmiths. They are powered by large language models that mix words together to create fluent prose. Ask it to draft an essay for you on a given topic, and it will put words together to do just that. Ask it to revise that draft based on your feedback, and it will do that, too. See, for instance, how Ethan Mollick used Bing to help him craft the final paragraph of his April 26th newsletter. Ask it to summarize a long text, and, because it’s good with words, you’ll get a pretty decent summary. It’s a wordsmith that actually doesn’t know what it’s writing but still produces intelligible texts.
This is, in fact, the other reason that educators are worried about AI text generators, because they can quickly produce acceptable responses to pretty standard essay question prompts, and educators are worried that students will use these tools to cheat, whether the essay question is of the “writing as assessment,” “writing to learn,” or “learn to write” variety. Because ChatGPT and its peers are good with words.
I’m struck by how the initial reporting and framing of these tools affect the ways we think about them. While AI text generators were seen as answer machines (albeit flawed ones), AI image generators have been seen as “smiths” of a different kind, working with pixels to create images. While a tool like ChatGPT making stuff up is seen as a problem, if I ask Midjourney or DALL-E (a couple of popular image generators) to give me a scene of robots playing basketball, no one worries about the result not being real-world realistic.
If AI text generators are tools for learning, as I argued on the blog last month, then I think it’s helpful to think of them as wordsmithing tools. Does a student struggle to come up with counter arguments for their thesis? Ask an AI tool to generate a few. Does a student freeze up when confronted with a blank page? Ask an AI tool to write a first draft. Does a student find it hard to adopt the right voice for their writing? Ask an AI tool to rewrite a draft essay in different voices. These are all wordsmithing tasks that ChatGPT and its ilk can handle pretty well.
Please note that I’m not suggesting we shouldn’t help students learn to develop counter arguments or to get past writer’s block or to figure out their writing voice. I am suggesting, however, that AI tools might be used to help students learn these skills, just as my digital camera helped me learn photography. Cynthia Alby uses the metaphor of learning to ride a bicycle with training wheels to talk about how AI tools might provide a kind of scaffolding for students learning writing skills. When I heard that metaphor, I was reminded of a 2012 blog post by Mark Sample, in which he talks about balance bikes as a different way to teach kids to ride bicycles. Learning with training wheels means getting help with balancing while learning to pedal, while learning with a balance bike means not worrying about pedaling while learning to balance, which is apparently easier for most kids. We might need to think carefully about where our students need the kind of support that AI tools can provide, and the answer might vary by student.
I’ve been using the training wheels and balance bike metaphors in my recent talks on teaching with AI, and I was all ready to bust out the “AI as wordsmith” argument above at a talk I gave earlier this week. But then I signed up for ChatGPT Pro to see what ChatGPT’s plugins are all about. Back in March, OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, announced that the tool would have plugins that allowed it to communicate (in a fashion) with other web tools and websites. It’s taken me three months, but I finally started playing around with these plugins. I quickly realized that some of the advice I had given faculty earlier in the year about designing “ChatGPT-proof” assignments hadn’t been accurate for a while!
For instance, if I ask the free version of ChatGPT, which uses GPT-3.5, to tell me about the May 2023 Supreme Court decision that dealt with Andy Warhol’s art, here’s the response I get:
I apologize for the confusion, but as of my knowledge cutoff in September 2021, I’m not aware of any specific Supreme Court decision in May 2023 related to Andy Warhol’s art. It’s possible that such a decision may have occurred after my knowledge cutoff or it may be a hypothetical scenario that hasn’t actually taken place. I recommend checking reliable news sources or legal references to get the most accurate and up-to-date information on any recent Supreme Court decisions regarding Andy Warhol’s art.
If I think about ChatGPT as an answer machine, I’m not getting the answer I want, but at least the tool is telling me what it doesn’t know. That’s an improvement over how the chatbot presented information at the start of 2023. But watch what happens when I use the same prompt in ChatGPT Pro with the VoxScript plugin enabled:
In May 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the Andy Warhol Foundation in a copyright infringement case. The case was centered around a series of silk screen images that Warhol created based on a photograph of the late musician Prince, taken by photographer Lynn Goldsmith in 1981.
The court ruled in a 7-2 vote that Warhol infringed on Goldsmith’s copyright. The case hinged on whether Warhol’s images of Prince transformed Goldsmith’s photograph to a great enough degree to stave off claims of copyright infringement and therefore be considered as fair use under copyright law.
Goldsmith had sued the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts (AWF) for copyright infringement after the foundation licensed an image of Warhol’s titled “Orange Prince” based on Goldsmith’s image of the pop artist to Condé Nast in 2016 for use in its publication Vanity Fair…
It goes on for another couple of paragraphs, and it gives me the news source it used to generate this summary of the case, a May 18th NPR report. This version of ChatGPT is indeed acting like an answering machine!
Quick sidebar: It is also now possible to share one’s ChatGPT correspondences with others. A few months ago, you needed some third-party tool to do so, but now ChatGPT has a share button for every chat. Thus the argument that there’s no “paper trail” for how one uses ChatGPT is no longer true.
I used ChatGPT for the above examples, but please remember that ChatGPT isn’t the only game in town. I asked Bing about the Andy Warhol case, and I got a similar summary, this time with three different news sources cited. Google Bard gave me a similar summary and added some text about how fair use works in the United States. Its sources, however, were meeting notes from a 2004 Congressional subcommittee hearing and a Quizlet created for maybe a law course? Your mileage may vary with these tools.
So are these tools now, in fact, answer machines? I’m going to argue that while they can be used in that way, a better way to think of them is as interfaces to other systems. Just as Siri or Alexa act as a voice-based interface to the apps on your digital devices, ChatGPT and Bing and such are text-based interfaces to, for instance, all the transcripts attached to all the YouTube videos. These tools are still wordsmiths, but wordsmiths used as interfaces.
To use a left field example, the fast food chain Wendy’s recently announced that it was working on an AI chatbot to take drive-thru orders. That’s AI-as-interface, with the chatbot, which is good with words, taking spoken orders for a cheeseburger and a Frosty and turning that into an order in the restaurant’s food production system. For a more academic example, consider Elicit, an AI research assistant that can help you find research in its corpus of 115 million academic papers that might address your research question. Ask it a question like “How should I form groups of students when using group work in the college classroom?” and (because it’s good with words) it will return a table of potentially relevant papers, summarized and tagged by intervention, sample size, and outcomes.
AI as answer machine, AI as wordsmith, AI as interface… I’m not sure where we’ll land with how we think about these tools, but I believe these framings are helpful in assessing what the tools can and cannot do and what roles they might play as learning technologies.
One more caveat: Most of what I’ve presented here is focused squarely on AI text generation tools powered by large language models. There are lots of other kinds of AI tools, like Cornell University’s Merlin app, which can identify birds by their songs, or that AI-powered agent that excelled at the strategic negotiation game Diplomacy, that don’t fall into any of the categories I’ve described here.
We’re honored to have edtech’s patron saint of resisting student surveillance, Ian Linkletter, join us on July 24th at 12 PM Eastern (9 AM Pacific) to discuss the crucial role of ethical edtech in our current moment. As many of you already know, Ian’s experience battling Proctorio’s SLAPP lawsuit has provided him a uniquely personal perspective on the tremendous costs and dangers of ceding control of higher education’s mission to greedy, unscrupulous vendors. His cause is that of anyone who believes education is not only a fundamental right, but provides the basic toolkit for every citizen to battle tyranny. Join us at https://watch.reclaimed.tech/reclaim-open for Ian’s call to action advocating for ethical edtech in the work we do.
This is just a quick update to document some of the work happening recently in the bavacade. It has a been a bit of catch as catch can given how busy the last month has been with the Reclaim open conference the and coming virtual event in July. That said, I’ve been sneaking in work here and there in the mornings, and as usual it adds up. I already blogged about the Yie-Ar Kung-fu custom cabinet project, and will be a summer long endeavor, but it’s very exciting. I also documented some of my work a couple of week’s ago testing various parts I bought in the US in the “Arcade Therapy” post, so things are definitely moving along.
More recently I have been testing some spare boards I have, namely a spare Make Trax board as well as spare Super Cobra board. This was also part of my attempt to start organizing all my parts and spares in the basement and get some semblance of order. I find testing and labeling when things worked saves me a ton of time, and some of the metadata on the boxes noted that these boards were questions marks. Also, I was looking to test a Crush Roller board in Make Trax I was sure I’d bought and brought to Italy over, but turns out I am either delusional or simply left it in Fredericksburg. Either way, because I’m obsessed I bought another Crush Roller board I found for a decent price in Germany along with a spare Moon Cresta board. The latter board is for the cocktail cabinet in Zach Davis is minding for me in Portland, Oregon, and I want to install and test the high score save kit on this one before shipping it back once I am in New Orleans next month.
The mint Moon Cresta Cocktail machine in residence at Cast Iron Coding’s HQ
Anyway, back to the spare Make Trax and Super Cobra boards. The Make Trax spare works, but the sound is noisy. It’s as if the sound pot is not working correctly and there it is too loud and scratchy, so will need to track that down a new potentiometer (pot) and see if tracing the audio gives me any insight. This board will be the first real PCB work (besides my botched Stargate repair attempts) I’ve attempted in earnest, and I’m hopeful it’s the start of some basic board work.
Stargate Yellow Screen of Death
If it goes well, the second project will be Super Cobra, which has an issue with the high score save kit. There are weird special characters in the high score save (HSS) kit and free play is not working. When I substituted the original roms—this board has several ROMs removed given they are programmed on the HSS kit—and Z80 chip from the working board the special characters went away. That said, there was then a strange rebooting issue with the game that did not happen with HSS kit in, so I’m going to buy new chips and burn the Super Cobra roms (a first for me). After that, I’ll try to track down the random rebooting issue, which is definitely an issue I can isolate to that board, should be fun!
Shot of Super Cobra with weird special characters in high score
As far as other work, I am making headway on monitor chassis repair. I had the spare Hanterex Polo in Cheyenne sent in for diagnosis given the original is stuck in the US on what’s shaping up to be an almost a 6-month wait, which I’m not thrilled about. I’ll keep pushing on the US repair, but in the meantime if the spare board is fixed here in Italy I can finally get this game back online. If that happens, then I’m just one G07 chassis and one K4600 chassis away from having everything running. I was able to repair the Condor G07 chassis that was dead by doing a cap kit, swapping out a new B+ filter cap as well as a horizontal width coil, and the chassis is working pretty well, but there’s a slight undulating wave that Tommaso tells me is good enough, but it’s annoying me, so I do think I need to replace all the adjustment pots, especially for vertical linearity and vertical hold.
In fact, I was certain I bought spare G07 pots, but I can’t find them for the life of me (part of the quest for order undertaken this week), so I’ve been parting out one of my extra, non-working G07 chassis. I’m also waiting on some 1.25 AMP fuses that should come today to try and get the chassis that came out of Pole Position working again. I think this chassis has either a bad flyback or a bad voltage regulator given there has been a recent cap kit done already. I might also need to swap the B+ filter cap. If that works, it will be put in Robotron, which leaves only the K4600 chassis for Challenger (I put Challenger‘s 4600 into Venture to get that game up and running) to repair. I’m not sure what is up there cause I swapped flyback and there was a recent cap kit, so a bit perplexed, but hopefully we some poking around and testing that will be the final piece of the puzzle. This is where the chorus sings, “Hope springs eternal in the bava heart.”
Cracks in the Make Trax control panel overlay
Cracks in the Make Trax control panel overlay
Finally, I have the Make Trax cabinet totally stripped and with Alberto to add wheels because every game will be on wheels sooner than later in the bavacade. The cabinet, overall, is close to mint save the control panel overlay which cracking. When Tim and I were getting Reclaim Arcade up and running I came across an original control panel overlay for this game and snagged it, it was one of the things that came over with the container so I asked Alberto iof he could remove the old one and add this one, and as he says to everything, “No problem!” He’s the best! He removed the old one, which by all accounts from Tim is a totally nightmare, and got it sanded and cleaned up.
Sanded Make Trax control panel ready for the like-new original overlay
After that, he put on the new overlay and it looks like new! So good. Sometimes those things I bought that I thought “Will I use this” are now almost all in use, and that makes me happy.
Alberto’s work on these cabinets continues to blow my mind, this control panel is, indeed, like new thanks to his craftsmanship
I think the next game to go on wheels will be Elevator Action, so will start taking that one apart, and that will mean 16 of the 30 games in the bavacade will be on wheels, and that means I am have crossed the half-way mark, which is encouraging progress! It also means I will have stripped almost every game down to just the cabinet if I manage to get wells on all of them. That’s pretty awesome.
Olia Lialina reading old school web publishing books
As part of our Reclaim Open online program we will be hosting scholar and artist Olia Lialina. From her early interactive hypertext My Boyfriend Came Back from the War (1996) to her archival work to resurrect Geocities in the One Terabyte of Kilobyte Age project. Lialina’s art and criticism have consistently focused on the web as a personal, creative universe to refactor how we imagine space, time, and relationships on the world wide web. She has been a professor of New Media at Merz Akademie in Stuttgart since 1999, and through her teaching, research, art, and writing provides a consistent voice to help us understand early web aesthetics, such the Prof. Dr. Style which highlights the seminal role universities played in the early look and feel of the web. More recently she has been exploring the current trajectory of the web moving “From My to Me.” Her talk at Reclaim, “Seeing 30 years of the WWW through different trajectories,” will map broader design and usability shifts over 30 years of the web through distinct moments and trajectories that highlight the steady loss of agency with monolithic platforms that erase the playful, personal spirit that made this space revolutionary. The talk will be streamed freely for any and all interested on July 17th at 12 PM Eastern (6 PM Central European) at https://watch.reclaimed.tech/reclaim-open
Also, if you’d like to interact with the stream, you can join Reclaim’s Discord instance at http://reclaimed.tech/discord and follow the Reclaim Open channel for live discussion during the event.
It’s been 12 or 13 years since its inception and I must say it’s kind of wild that ds106 won’t die. That’s gotta say something about how awesome it was/is/will be, right? I guess it really is #4life!
Few people have done more over the past decade to keep this course chugging along than the great Paul Bond. So, when Paul approached me with the idea of putting ds106 on trial at Reclaim Open, I was in. Paul and I have worked together over the years on a few classes, and ds106 was just one of them. We co-taught the True Crime course as well as the Internet Course at UMW, both of which were laboratory experiments in the spirit of the hallowed ds106. So when Paul framed the session as a trial we immediately went back to our True Crime roots.
Paul decided to frame the session as a sensational trial using the Aesthetic of the colonial American trials often predicated on a public display of shame and condemnation. Paul wrote the script, created the awesome trial poster above, and essentially did all the work. He was to be the accused, Martha Burtis the ornery judge, I was type-cast as the boisterous prosecutor, and the audience played the jury. It was really quite fun.
To promote the talk, Paul not only hung the poster in the main conference area during the art fair, but we also staged a short, impromptu performance wherein Paul was seated near the poster and I gathered the attention of the group loudly and started listing his crimes against ds106, while imploring attendees to join the session later that day to find this miscreant guilty of….
I mean, that list of abuses is pretty awesome, no? Paul is pretty awesome, and once again he delivers for ds106 because he’s definitely guilty of being #4life! You can see the entire session below:
Both the impromptu public shaming and the official trial were loose, rough, and a total blast, much in the spirit of ds106. But what was even cooler was the response from the audience calling for more art, dammit. It was even floated that the whole trial was just a ruse to re-engage some of the original ds106 crew to get the band back together. I can neither confirm nor deny any of this, but I will say after seeing what Michael Branson Smith did with the A.I. Levine session at Reclaim Open Paul, Martha, and I decided we are interested in creating a class for Spring 2024 that would essentially be a ds106 course focused on AI. Any folks interested in collaborating on such a project? Any schools willing to throw a course at it? Or have us teach a course for your campus? Let us know.
Dr. Oblivion!
A ds106 focused on AI means we may be able to coax Dr. oblivion out of hiding to run this course. He was always a staunch champion of interrogating the contested future of digital storytelling, so it may be high time!
So there’s two reasons for this post. The first is that I was going through my list of those miscellaneous ideas that you can do at some point in the future that would be fun or helpful (hopefully) but that you never quite get around to, and I saw something on there that seemed like it would be quick and maybe hopefully useful to someone.
The second one is that, by the deadlines that I personally have set, today is the last day to publish a blog post that will make it into the June newsletter and if I put something out then I will have two blog posts in a newsletter for the first time since October 2022 (I need to blog more).
Anyway, I was going through my to-do list and in the section of “miscellaneous ideas for the future” I saw something about making a diagram of how the three systems of Domain of One’s Own work together. It’s something I have to explain a lot when training new admins, and while I feel like I’ve got a pretty good handle on the overarching metaphor by now, training usually focuses on each system’s user interface and what admins can do with that system, so I always worry I’ve skimped on making sure they’ve got the full picture.
To that end, I made a diagram.
This was very much something I saw on the list and went “Hey, I could do a pretty version of that in the future given a couple of days and some dedicated resources, or I could do a functional version of that right now using Google Drive’s weird photomanipulation-ish drawing platform.” And functional now is better than pretty later.
So, voila: The Diagram.
Hope I didn’t hype it up too much.
Is this accurate? That’s gonna be a strong “maybe.” But it’s close enough for our purposes, it only took about twenty minutes, and I got this blog post done in time for the Roundup deadline, so I’m going to call this a win.
It’s definitely not perfect. Looking at it now I’m thinking of all the little adjustments that I want to make, both in the text and in the design. But like I said back in October, sometimes you have to let perfection go.
Also, it’s here as a PDF too I guess, since Google Draw also offers that as an export format.
This is the first time I have written about the AI craze that has swept the web over the past 6 months or so. I’ve been intentionally resisting the urge given so many of the hot takes, hysteria, and complaints seem pointless. The only way to start wrapping your head around this post-humanistic beast that cannot die is through art, and so it happened when I was chatting with Michael Branson Smith (MBS) about what he might present at Reclaim Open. We had a wide-ranging chat, as always, and he started talking about using AI to generate a “fake” presentation, all he would need is someone who has written about a topic extensively and we can get access to samples of both their video and audio likeness. I think at that point MBS said something to the effect of, “You know, someone like Alan and his SPLOTs.” BINGO!
Image credit: Alan Levine’s “Combination of one frame from the Reclaim Open 2023 presentation The SPLOT Revolution will be Artificial with a conference logo and a SPLOT logo,” call the whole thing CC BY.
The rest is kind of history, I was thrilled to play some small role as a sounding board for MBS’s epic vision. In fact, I almost torpedoed it by suggesting we do it entirely without letting Alan know beforehand. I was fascinated by what his reaction would be after discovering his likeness and ideas were used to present at Reclaim Open without any prior head’s up. I mean it would give him another reason to rail against AI, right? But this was not so much because I wanted to piss him off, but because I think it would underline the blurry ethical lines where open, available content and credit get deeply complicated in the realm of AI generated content. That said, I also recognized that making a statement about AI and ethics was less important than offending a friend, so we looped Alan in, and he provided video and audio for MBS to train for A.I. Levine’s 5-minute talk on SPLOTs.*
The session was amazing, and you can watch it above in all its glorious hilarity. At the last minute we had the idea to loop Alan into the presentation with the idea of him acting irate and faking indignation at the whole thing. Alan, as expected, was even better than his A.I. likeness, and it was really a joyful, thoughtful session that underscored the serious implications of this new technology without being pedantic or sensational. It was also amazing to have Alan play such a powerful role at Reclaim Open from afar and, of course, he already blogged it.
This session also helped me understand the best way, at least for me, to come to terms with the artificial elephant on the web, namely to think of it as a creative challenge to explore the limits and possibilities of this tech. This spawned the idea of shopping around a new iteration of ds106 that’s centered on AI, which a subsequent session that put ds106 on trial cemented, but more on that in another post.
____________________________
*According to MBS, the audio and video he found elsewhere were even more effective, and I am hoping MBS will blog a post-mortem in which he narrrates his process, because it was pretty amazing.
Coming at you from Elkhart, Indiana, where it's raining, we left Poppy's dog bed out overnight, and the smell of wet dog and the sop of wet dog bed is going to really suck for the next bit of our journey. We're in the Eastern time zone now, which despite my being ride-of-die for the West coast, is truly the best time zone — you're up and getting things done before the West has even settled into REM sleep. But even though we're east-ish, we still have over a week to go before Move In Day. (Hence my anguish over that wet dog smell.)
It's been a week:
Movers came on Tuesday and packed everything. I also started training for the Staten Island Half Marathon (big hint there as to where we're moving), with the first speed workout I've done in months. Brutal. We ate at Xolo Taqueria before we left town — the taco stand across the street from our apartment and where we ate for our first Oakland meal when we moved in three-plus years ago. We also grabbed an ice cream from Miharu, which just opened on the corner. I had one with brownies and corn flakes — because breakfast is my thing now, amirite?
We stayed at a Motel 6 in Fairfield Tuesday night so that we were near the storage site for the RV. Wednesday morning, we grabbed breakfast at Wendy's — like I said, breakfast is a theme — and then hit the road.
Wednesday's destination: Battle Mountain, Nevada. I got up Thursday morning and ran.
Thursday night: a KOA campground in Rock Springs, Wyoming. We had donuts at Cowboy Donuts on Friday, a nod to the usual donut run. (They weren't anywhere near as good as Happy Donuts.) We stopped at the Little America in Cheyenne for a couple of their 75 cent ice cream cones — one for each of us, Poppy included.
Friday night we were in Ogallala, Nebraska, just in time for a tornado watch and a storm that was so violent that I figured we were going to die. Kin slept through it, and I didn't wake him because I figure one wants to die in one's sleep and how fucking rude to wake someone up just to tell them "we're going to die." We didn't die. Saturday morning, I ran.
Saturday's breakfast — we're testing out as many fast food breakfasts as we can, and it's "research," right? — was at Sonic. It took almost half an hour for our food to come. It was pretty sub-par. Do not recommend.
Saturday night, we arrived in Adel, Iowa, in time for another tornado watch. I ran on Sunday morning — my long run, which was supposed to be 75 minutes but I got lost and ran for about 20 minutes more. Hardest run I've ever done — psychologically, for sure, but also physically because who the fuck put hills in Iowa.
And here we are in Elkhart. Kin is still asleep. Poppy is back in bed too. We'll hit the road soon, I imagine, and keep heading east. We'll run out of I-80 highway tomorrow.
I was in Amsterdam from Monday to Friday this week, for MozFest House and a WAO meetup. We ran a session entitled ‘Fostering Transparency and Building a Cooperative Economy’. I also lied about my personal details and preferences to get free iced coffee, hung out on a boat, and melted in the heat.
Our house went on the market while I was away, as things moved more quickly than I envisaged. This is a good thing, as we had five viewings booked in yesterday. I was out with my daughter, who was at a Future Lioness event and then represented East Northumberland in the discus at the area athletics championships. She had to run from that even to take part in the relay, and then pretty much kept on running to do the first leg!
I’m keeping this short as we’re about to go and view a house that would potentially be a backup plan to the one we really want. I published a single blog post this week, other than this one, which I called On the paucity of ‘raising awareness’.
Next week it’s back to work in my home office. I hope it’s not too hot, as the lack of sleep from late nights and being in a really hot room with no openable windows while in Amsterdam really took it out of me.
The post Weeknote 25/2023 first appeared on Open Thinkering.This post is about philosophy, memes, and taking action. It’s a reflection on an experience I had this week which caused me to reflect on the paucity of ‘awareness raising’ as a tactic.
I studied Philosophy at university a couple of decades ago. One of the courses was on ethics and involved the trolley problem.
The trolley problem is a series of thought experiments in ethics and psychology, involving stylized ethical dilemmas of whether to sacrifice one person to save a larger number. The series usually begins with a scenario in which a runaway tram or trolley is on course to collide with and kill a number of people (traditionally five) down the track, but a driver or bystander can intervene and divert the vehicle to kill just one person on a different track. Then other variations of the runaway vehicle, and analogous life-and-death dilemmas (medical, judicial etc.) are posed, each containing the option to either do nothing, in which case several people will be killed, or intervene and sacrifice one initially “safe” person to save the others.
It’s a powerful tool to generate insights into your own ethical position on certain topics. These days, it’s rolled out to warn about outsourcing decision-making to the systems underpinning self-driving cars. And, of course, it’s now a recognisable meme.
In my experience, most of the trolley problem thought experiments lead towards an understanding of supererogation.
In ethics, an act is supererogatory if it is good but not morally required to be done. It refers to an act that is more than is necessary, when another course of action—involving less—would still be an acceptable action. It differs from a duty, which is an act wrong not to do, and from acts morally neutral. Supererogation may be considered as performing above and beyond a normative course of duty to further benefits and functionality.
Interestingly, in a recent episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast, Theron Pummer suggested a twist on this. Pummer, who is a Senior Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of St Andrews and Director of the Centre for Ethics, Philosophy and Public Affairs, has published a book entitled The Rules of Rescue. I haven’t read it yet, but to quote the summary on his own web page about the book:
Pummer argues that we are often morally required to engage in effective altruism, directing altruistic efforts in ways that help the most. Even when the personal sacrifice involved makes it morally permissible not to help at all, he contends, it often remains wrong to provide less help rather than more.
I have issues with Effective Altruism, which I’ll not go into here, but I find Pummer’s framing fascinating. Basically, you don’t have to help others in certain situations; no-one would think it was immoral or illegal to go about your business. However, if you do decide to help, then there’s a minimum amount of help that could reasonably be required.
This week, I was at MozFest House. I had a good time. As with all MozFests I’ve been to, there are exhibits with which you can interact. One of them asked you to use a touch screen to fill in details of the kinds of services you use. It then printed out a long receipt on the type of data that is gathered on you when using them. I asked the PhD students who had come up with the machine what I was supposed to do with this data. They intimated that they were merely raising awareness and didn’t suggest a single thing I could do.
I was left in a worse position than I began. One could say that’s the point of awareness-raising, that it’s about making people feel discomfort so that they take action. But if you’re going to make an intervention I would agree with Theron Pummer’s stance that there’s a certain minimum level of guidance to give. A first step, at least.
Contrast this with another interactive exhibit in which you received tokens for free coffee if you answered a series of questions about yourself. I managed to get three by lying and not providing personal data. Which, of course, could be said to be the point of the exercise: be careful about the data you put out there, especially for scant reward.
Once you see people putting in the minimum effort of ‘awareness raising’ you start seeing it everywhere. It’s particularly prevalent on social media, where it takes a single tap to reshare news and make others aware of something you’ve just seen. As humans, though, we tend to have a bias towards avoiding harm so social media timelines become full of doom.
I’m on a bit of a mission to get some more positivity into my life. Not in a mindless way. Not in an avoiding-reality kind of way. But rather following people who have noticed a problem and are doing something about it. Seeking out those who can take a step back and look at the wider picture. And, of course, those who share some of the wonder of the world around us.
The post On the paucity of ‘raising awareness’ first appeared on Open Thinkering.YAPARO! or, yet another post about Reclaim Open I’ve been inspired by so many great posts about Reclaim Open, and I’d spend more time summarizing them here, but that’s in the works for Reclaim Roundup, so I’ll try not to duplicate efforts. That said, Tim Klapdor already did a lot of this work in his “Journal – Week 24 2023” post. I love Tim, and he’s one of the many folks we missed dearly at Reclaim Open, but his spirit was very much present, particularly his brilliant thinking in this post about the coming costs of universities outsourcing our IT expertise—I still need to blog it, but let this quote suffice for the moment:
Almost every University now spends millions of dollars every year as a tax to Microsoft and AWS for hardware and a handful of software vendors to run their core business. Without spending that money, the University could not exist. They are now trapped into paying this indefinitely, and because the competition has been eaten up over time, we are now in a monopolistic vice. Over the next few years, we will see the vice tighten and the costs rise.
The only way to exit this state is to escape it entirely. Applying the same ideals as renewable energy – what if the new University set itself up to run independently as a sovereign entity, not reliant on 3rd party vendors and their costs? What if it embraced open-source software and collective hardware, not just as a consumer but as a contributor? What if it then sold those services and knowledge to others?
This outsourcing of core infrastructure and, as a result, staff expertise has absolutely become the rule in higher ed IT. Something folks at OpenETC and CUNY, amongst others, have pushed back on for years, but there is no denying the pandemic accelerated that process. Tim’s idea that the cost vice from these monolithic services will only get tighter and universities need to start considering alternatives sooner than later is right on. His likening that to renewable energy hits on yet another theme from Reclaim Open, and I’m beginning to get a sense that there is a core of edtech thinkers that are converging on some of these ideas and it is exciting to witness (Anne-Marie Scott is another I recently quoted).
And this is where the experience on the ground at Reclaim Open comes in, three days of thinking through this stuff with such awesome people in a loose, congenial environment was the ultimate professional development for the Reclaim Hosting team. Some of the Reclaim crew have only a vague idea of the world wide web of ed tech (whereas others have come up in it), so creating an experience where everyone got to hear, talk, and interact with practitioners in this field was the absolute best experiential learning imaginable.
I mean I hope everyone who came to Reclaim Open had a good time, I sure did, but at the same time this conference was pretty selfish. I wanted this group of passionate, generous educators who showed up to interact with a young, amazing team that’s just getting its feet. I knew the people we had collected could provide a welcome reminder to lead with the heart and the art. Watching the Reclaim team get inspired was the most powerful element of the three-day event. Which was epitomized by the moment when Noah, who started 8 months ago, came up to me after the last day and said “I kept hearing about this Aaron Schwartz guy, so I Googled him and WOW!” That was magic. I knew then and there this was akin to Faculty Academy or Northern Voice during my formative edtech years—I needed that community. Turns out we all do to some extent. Putting together people at different stages in their career provides a longer, inter-generational sense of what was, is, and can be in any field. But particularly in a field like edtech where the story is constantly being hijacked by the industry, erasing the work of many who have been part of a small, human-scaled community using accessible tech for teaching and learning—a noble calling that cannot, as Tim Klapdor reminds us, thrive in the monopolistic vacuum of big tech.
Getting the band back together! image credit: “DTLT at Reclaim Open” by Shannon Hauser
Ok, so there’s that, which brings me to the Division of Teaching and Learning Technology (DTLT) panel that took place during the un-conference. It was another selfish undertaking that brought together many of the original DTLT staff at UMW that worked on campus at some point between the mid 90s through today. All of the people on that panel I consider both friends and amazing colleagues, and they all had a huge impact on my personal and professional career. I cannot overstate how much I love these people, each and every one. So again, I am recognizing some deep bias here. That said, this was a team that many in the world of open web edtech looked at as a “city upon the hill,” we were brash, we wove the web into just about every course on campus, and we did it ethically and humanely. We worked individually with faculty and students alike, we taught some far-out classes to lead by example, and we built* and maintained the infrastructure where all this happened. We did the work and also had a ton of fun doing it, we were a team of people UMW had invested in for more than 20 years and the proof was in the pudding, things got done, the culture changed, and the possibilities of thinking through the web as a core literacy for the liberal arts was not only floated, but buttressed by an entire group that had the tools at their disposal to scale that vision across departments for an entire campus. What happened at UMW was impressive, people took notice, and there was a sense of anything’s possible. The “Dream team,” if you will, but nothing lasts forever, the pendulum swings back, and as Luke noted in his amazing post reflecting on Reclaim Open:
Much of the past decade has been spent refining, defending, and caring for that space with a cadre of comrades, while helping new generations of scholars learn how to build through it towards their goals. Though that work continues, I’ve watched with growing angst as the public university system all around us becomes ever more susceptible to the neoliberal logics of extraction, surveillance, and control. The work has become more tiring, and I came to Reclaim Open hoping to make better sense of my past and present, and to think more about futures I could be proud of, or even energized by.
It has been a tough decade for edtech, and there is a lot to be concerned about for sure, but I wonder if Tim Klapdor’s vision around university’s reclaiming their centrality by investing in people, not vendors, might be one possible future. And I want to believe teams like Reclaim Hosting model a lot of the values and work that was traditionally the domain of universities, that’s part of the education of this emerging team at Reclaim—to understand the deep connection we have to the universities we support, to understand in so many ways we were born of that system, but have also figured out a way to transcend some of its more internecine tendencies when it comes to the plague of our current generation of incompetent administration. This might be where Luke Waltzer’s highlight of the role of Chip German in the formation and preservation of UMW’s DTLT is quite telling:
The convening launched with a panel featuring the DTLT All-Stars reminiscing about what had been, and trying to identify the ingredients in the special sauce that made that unit such a powerhouse of innovation and experimentation 10-15 years ago. I came away thinking: damn, Chip German is the unsung hero of this story. His perspicaciousness and advocacy cleared the space for the DTLT gang to do their thing, and then he protected it.
How much of our current malaise in edtech is driven by a sense of capitulating both agency and vision for our universities to those that simply want to sell us a solution? I do understand the irony of me saying this as a vendor, but at the same time I think Reclaim Hosting is much more than that, and in some ways the state of the university administration and purchasing economy has forced us into a kind of exile, if you will. Is the only space for a dream team like DTLT in 2023 outside the walls of higher ed? I don’t think so, the work Kathleen Fitzpatrick is doing at Michigan State University highlights a powerful node of resistance, as do the aforementioned OpenETC and the CUNY mafia’s open insurrection. I’m sure there are many others, but the key is connecting those stories and collectively weaving a narrative of resistance and hope to battle the exhaustion and disillusionment. I do think Reclaim is a dream team in the making, but what became abundantly clear at Reclaim Open is that cannot happen in a vacuum, this needs to be a networked, connected ‘movement’ (the scare quotes are for Brian Lamb) that both articulates and creates the future of edtech we want to see. I think Reclaim is doing our part, but we need to do it in collaboration with others—that collective action is the thing that will push that pendulum away from its current parabola towards disconnection. And as Meredith Fierro notes in her forward-looking meditation on Reclaim Open:
I’d love to see more younger voices in our community, sharing their work and awesome perspectives. I’d love to explore how our work can be sustainable too. Working online has its perks, but finding small ways to help the environment a bit, will help keep it around far longer.
Voices like Amy Gay, Ruth Carpenter, Annescia Dillard, Nick Plank, and Alex Carney to name just a few were part of a new community of edtech that I want to hear more from, and I would throw that overseas to Lauren Heywood and Alex Masters in the UK. So many awesome folks. In fact, I see a lot of their fellow travelers in the cast of characters that comprises the Reclaim crew, all of whom were fired up about Bryan Alexander’s talk around the future and the importance of sustainability, renewable energy, and a way towards some kind of punk, whether edu, solar, or hope, they all provide an opening beyond our moment.
“The Reclaim Hosting Crew post Reclaim Open” image stolen from Meredith
________________________________________
*Is installing WordPress building?
I’m embarking on a new-to-me bavacade adventure, namely working with Bryan Mathers to create custom side art for the 1985 fighter Yie-Ar Kung-Fu. This game was the most popular arcade conversion kit of 1985. What’s a conversion kit? It often refers to a board modification that enables operators to convert an older, less popular game into a brand new title—all without buying a new cabinet. It probably made good sense for the arcade owners back-in-the-day, and such conversions helped the industry recover from the video game crash of 1983. But the conversion kits often meant that the cabinets were never really as iconic as their predecessors, and the first thing to go was usually attention to the art, which was definitely the case with Yie-Ar. The side art was a slap on, rectangular image that does little justice to the various characters you challenge along the way.
Yie-Ar Kung-Fu side art
I got one of those Yie-Ar Kung-Fu conversion kits in a Defender cabinet a few years ago, and recently did some work to clean it up and add wheels. Rather than buying a reproduction sticker for the side art, I thought it would be cool to dream up some custom art for this cabinet. This is something I’ve seen folks do in the hobby, and it can make for an awesome art project. Problem is I’m not a graphic artist, but then I thought of the magical Bryan Mathers, so I reached out and he is game.
Fairly intact original Defender side art under 3 coats of paint
So, the cabinet we will be creating the art for is a previously converted Defender cabinet that has a very distinctive shape. When sanding down the various coats of paint the original art work appeared. What’s more, it was in very good shape! We primed over it as a layer of protection in the event someone wants to reclaim this cabinet in the future.
Defender Cabinet primed and ready for custom art
So we know the shape of the cabinet, and Bryan and I chatted about possible side art, and I was hoping to highlight the different backgrounds which are a cave-based waterfall for level one rounds, and a Japanese palace for level two. So using those backgrounds on the side art somehow would be cool.
Cave-dwelling waterfall background
Japanese palace background
Then I thought of the side art from the Sidam Explorer, which features comic panels with an abstracted, brooding astronaut:
So amazing, then the idea brewed that we might do 11 unique panels each featuring one of the various characters you fight. perhaps 6 on one side and 5 on the other. Perhaps highlighting the cave fights on one side and the palace fights on another? I don’t know, but it sounded awesome in the moment. Bryan is planning on using a 3-D rendering of a defender cabinet to fit the panels together like a puzzle, and then work within those pieces to see how it all looks in glorious 3D, so wild:
Defender Arcade by Delinx on Sketchfab
I’m not sure if the above model is what Bryan will use, but I really dug the idea of him modelling it all in 3D and building virtually first to figure out how to fit the panels to match the cabinet, see what colors will work, and get a sense of the design in three dimensions, etc. Once we have that all locked-in, I will find a someone here in Italy who can do a hi-res print to vinyl. So, this is the beginning of what will be my first custom art conversion kit that will be a true one-of-a-kind in the bavacade. YEAH!
Creating a couple of videos highlighting Taylor’s 1-click Mastodon installer for Reclaim Cloud has been on my to-do for too long, so this week I knocked it out. I did two quick videos, the first takes you through the basic install. While the installer is a Docker container and most of the heavy lifting is done for you, there are still some manual pieces like pointing a domain, creating an admin account, and restarting the container. Taylor’s guide goes through these points in detail, so this is really just a video supplement to the docs.
The follow-up video is focused on where and how to update the environment variables in the .env file. You use the .env file to add details for transactional email like Mailgun, as well as to point the media storage to a third-party S3-compatible service like Digital Ocean’s Spaces. Once again, this video serves to reinforce the guide we already have for doing this, so if the video fails you can fallback on the guide.
The final piece would be to highlight the simple set of commands to upgrade to a newer Mastodon version. I am working with Taylor to make sure that is working as expected, once that happens I’ll be sure to finish off this trilogy of Mastodon 1-click awesome.
I was at the EDEN conference this week in Dublin (excellent conference by the way, congrats to EDEN and the DCU team). Although I’ve done a couple of conferences, this was the first time seeing a lot of people I used to bump into regularly prior to the pandemic. It made me reflect that much of what happened during that time (2020-2022) is already fading from memory. This prompted me to look back over some journals I kept at the time, and I was right, I had forgotten most of the unusual work and roles we took on then, plus the stress of worrying about family, and the continual stream of lockdown variants.
Michael Ward at Swansea Uni started an interesting Corona Diaries project during this period, which capture much of this sense of anxiety, puzzlement, anger and uncertainty. My daughter even did some work inputting the entries. Looking through those and my own entries made me think we should share some of our experiences from the higher education perspective, before our human capacity to recover and move on means all those moments are lost in time, like tears in rain, or at least face masks in the bin.
So here are some edited highlights of my covid diaries, I’d love to hear yours:
18th May 20 I have 8.30 scrums most mornings now for the microcredential course. I wrote for this until 5.30
had a day that covered all my academic roles today – course author, senior manager, researcher, journal editor, administrator, speaker, fund raiser. Finished after 6
I finished at 6.30 and went outside for a neighbour’s socially distanced 70th birthday. Everyone in the street came out and they poured champagne in glasses we left at the end of the drive.
Long working day again but then I’m on leave. I feel the problem of having too many roles at the moment – they’ve all increased by 20% because of the pandemic so I’m failing on multiple fronts. Went to bed by 9.30 and slept for 9 hours.
I did a webinar this evening for EDEN with Catherine Cronin on use of oer in the online pivot, then had a quick meeting with people from COL on doing another webinar. It is the year of webinars.
27th Sept [daughter] has had her first week at uni, she has settled in well with her flatmates. In Glasgow and Manchester Covid has spread wildly through student halls and it’s surely only a matter of time before it hits them.
18th Oct We are likely to be entering a short ‘circuit-breaker’ lockdown on Friday, for 17 days in Wales. Numbers have been rising and the hospitals are near to overload.
26th Oct [daughter’s] flatmate has been diagnosed with Covid, and [daughter] thinks she has it too. She rang me at 1.30 last night and today was in tears. It’s difficult enough learning to live with 6 strangers, but having to negotiate how they’ll all deal with pandemic and self-isolation adds another layer of stress and tension to it.
21st Nov I did an interview for the BBC and Natwest this week, both for web articles on the shift to online learning.
It’s been a busy week, we needed to get a microcredential course in presentation by tomorrow, which meant writing a week’s worth of work and doing some odd tasks.
6th Dec The Welsh government announced last Monday that from Friday pubs would close at 6 and not be allowed to serve alcohol. Most have sensibly decided that pubs not serving alcohol are rather pointless and have shut. I went to the pub last Tuesday, and that was it, no pubs for christmas or new years. There is a rumour that we will be going into full lockdown again on 28th December.
It was announced today that we’re going into full lockdown again on the 28th, and I rang my father today to say we’re not coming up before Christmas.
20th Dec Wales went into lockdown last night, unexpectedly and without warning – we had been told it was coming on the 28th. Shops are to close, no meeting up, no travel. It means I might not even get to see [daughter] over the xmas holidays. It plunged me into depression last night – not just the lack of contact but the necessity to keep finding ways to be positive, to dig again and manufacture methods of staying active, being supportive and restructuring the day.
13th Jan We’re deep in lockdown now, with around 1500 deaths a day, and 50,000 infections
I’ve had a few insomniac nights, getting 3-4 hours sleep each night, but it shouldn’t be a surprise really when ALL of this is going on.
17th Jan We’re still in lockdown now, I forget what it was like not to be in lockdown now. We’ve been in some variety of it since September and that was after a four month one.
I did a keynote for the H818 conference today. I’ve got another keynote on Monday for Belfast Met, and completed a review of e-learning rubrics for UNESCO this week.
Mar 14th (after getting a puppy) Yesterday I felt claustrophobic, trapped in one room mostly, still in lockdown, it felt like we’d been taken hostage by two canine terrorists
4th Apr I went to see [daughter] last week, as we’re now allowed to travel within Wales. We met up in Brecon and she walked Posey. I had my first vaccination jab on Friday. It was in a large leisure centre in Pentwyn. I found the experience strangely moving in its quiet efficiency.
I expect lots of you have more intense or interesting journals from the time, but I found it fascinating just how much of this I had forgotten.
FreshRSS 