A statement from philosophers in response to the knife attack on the professor and students in a philosophy of gender course at the University of Waterloo this week, in which they โaffirm our commitment to academic freedom, and condemn all uses of violence, intimidation, or derogation that attempt to undermine philosophical examinations of gender and sexualityโ has been published and is open for signatures by other members of the philosophical community.
The statement was authored by Robin Dembroff (Yale), Justin Khoo (MIT), and L.A. Paul (Yale). It states:
The statement is posted here. Those interested in adding their name to the list of signatories can do so via this form.
ย
The post Statement from Philosophy Professors & Graduate Students on University of Waterloo Attack first appeared on Daily Nous.
Over 100 Israeli philosophers have signed an open letter to the Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, and the nationโs Minister of Justice, Yariv Levin, expressing concern about recently advanced legal changes.
[photo by Ohad Zwigenberg]
The new government in Israel has launchedโwith unbelievable speedโa campaign for massive, deeply anti-democratic constitutional โreformโ. The main people behind this reform take their cues from similar โreformsโ in such places as Poland and Hungary (initially only implicitly, recently they are entirely open and loud about looking up to these places). These measures include a change in the appointment and promotion procedures for judges that will make it entirely politicized and up to the current coalitionโs whims; putting in place an override clause that will allow the current coalition to set aside courtโs decisions that declare pieces of legislation unconstitutional; severely weakening the status and authority of the governmentโs legal advisors; and more.
The aimโand likely consequenceโof these measures is making our independent judiciary a thing of the past, and giving the current (extreme right-wing) coalition unencumbered force, with nothing even remotely resembling checks and balances. Itโs easy to guess who will be the first to suffer. (For one exampleโof the expected consequences for womenโseeย here.)
These measures are opposed by a huge majority of law professors (see, for instance, the various pieces here and here). ย
The open letter states:
We, over one hundred Israeli philosophers teaching in all the universities and colleges in the country, wish to express our anxiety at the far-reaching legal reforms that are hastily advanced these days in the Knesset. The moral achievements of the modern liberal-democratic state are the fruit of centuries of political thought and of a persistent struggle to apply it in the stateโs constitutional structure: human and civil rights, the separation of powers, the protection of the individual from the arbitrary exercise of governmental power, and the equality of every human being without discrimination on the basis of nationality, race, religion, ethnicity, gender, or sexual inclination.
We warn against the political and cultural danger of the self-isolation of Israel within narrow ethnocentric bounds, ignoring universal values such as the dignity of human beings as human beings, openness to other cultures, and the freedom of scientific research and artistic creation.
Twentieth-century experience has demonstrated the intolerable ease with which democratic states backslide from the primary liberal principleโthe limitation of government power, particularly by undermining the independence of the judiciary. Such regress begins with a regime that is democratic only in the formal sense of majority rule and ends in dictatorship.
Professor Enoch adds, โMany outside of Israel have also spoken clearly against these โreformsโ. It would be great if philosophers elsewhere are also heard on this.โ
The letter and the list of its signatories is below.
UPDATEย (2/28/23): A group of British Jewish philosophers have written a letter in support of their Israeli colleagues:
ย
ย
ย