Ignorance is an activity, it isnโt simply not knowing but a form of knowing supported by the socio-political system. โLisa Slater
It is well documented that youth sport teaches young people life lessons โ about themselves, the importance of teamwork, etc. In this short reflexive essay (drawn from a larger book project), I consider another kind of education at work in youthsโ encounters with sport in settler states โ countries founded upon the theft of land from Indigenous peoples: it teaches young settlers, in particular, about their place in the world, their โrightโ to live on stolen lands.
Here, I take up selected fragments of my childhood and youth, interrogating how my encounters with sport (as both a participant and a consumer) shaped my understandings of myself and my belonging on lands claimed by Canada. I consider, in the words of social scientist Lisa Slater, some of the โdimly lit memoriesโ that provide clues to my developing sense of self.
I sit on the hard bleachers of McMahon stadium, bouncing my legs as fast as I can to try to generate warmth while we watch a Calgary Stampeders Canadian Football League game. As Dad and I drink hot chocolate from a thermos, the โStampsโ score a TD, and a horse and rider run the length of the field in celebration. I scream in joy, looking around at the thousands of mostly white boys and men doing the same. My โhome teamโ is playing their perpetual rivals, now called the Edmonton Elk.
A snippet like this could just as easily have come from an NHL hockey game between the Calgary Flames and the team from Chicago. On one hand, then, I encountered tropes of Indigeneity such as Indigenous team names and mascots in these hyper-masculine professional sport settings, normalizing this as part of my childhood, teaching me what kind of person I should (want to) be. On the other, attending these games โ or fervently following the Flames, in particular, especially as part of the โbattle of Albertaโ in the heydays of both the Flames and the Edmonton Oilers โ produced a sense of belonging, tying me to this place, making it feel very much like home. It was my home, but was also produced as such in ongoing and banal ways.
I am playing a sport; I donโt even remember which one. Judging by the coaches I encountered in my high school years, Iโd guess football. The coach is trying to get our attention: โBoys. Pow-wow over here!โ He blathers on, something about putting in the work if we want to make it to the โtop of the totem pole.โ
I am caught up in the excitement of Calgary hosting the Olympic Winter Games. I covet the Sun Ice jackets volunteers and others sport, follow the saga of Eddie the Eagle, attend a couple of medal ceremonies at Olympic Plaza downtown, getting choked up when I see Canadians atop the medal podium as โO Canadaโ plays over the loudspeakers. I collect pins, and consume many events, both in person and via the televised broadcasts.
As historian Christine OโBonsawin articulates, the Calgary Olympics employed โIndigenous imageryโ in numerous dimensions of the organization of the Games, marshalling the cachรฉ of the Calgary Stampede to garner international attention and construct the Games as of this place. Organizers, she notes:
utilized the international prestige of the Calgary Stampede and based their cultural programming around the Stampedeโs symbolic use of the Mountie, the cowboy and the Indianโฆ For example, the composition of the Olympic medals displayed winter sporting equipment protruding from a ceremonial headdress, an enormous teepee at McMahon Stadium supporting the Olympic cauldron, and the Calgary Stampede Boardโs suggestion that an โIndian attack and wagon-burningโ be a part of the opening ceremony (this was ultimately rejected).
The Olympics, then, mobilized and marketed โIndigenous imageryโ while, at the very same moments, hailing me โ producing me โ as Canadian, as rightfully belonging on these lands. Think here of the anthem, for instance, the notion of โhome and native land.โ (Also consider Jully Blackโs recent act subverting these lyrics.)
Part of the ideological โ[sleight] of handโ of settler colonialism is the illusion that it is a process that is finished as opposed to one that requires constant nurturing and reproduction. Similarly, my at-homeness as a settler was and is not simply a given, but one that was and is nourished in innumerable spaces and ways, not least through my encounters with sport as a youth. We are born into these positions, but we also encounter everyday teaching moments that shape our understandings of and relation to ongoing histories on these lands. Only if we recognize these teaching moments can we interrogate and, perhaps, refuse them as we come to understand, in the words of cultural studies scholar Mark Rifkin, โthat the very terrain [we] inhabit as given has never ceased to be a site of political struggle.โ
Jason (Jay) Laurendeauย is a white, cisgender, settler scholar in the Department of Sociology at the University of Lethbridge, in Lethbridge, Alberta, located on lands of the Siksikaitsitapii people, who are part of the Blackfoot Confederacy. His research interests lie at the intersections of sport and physical culture, gender, settler colonialism, and childhood.ย He is the author of Sport, Physical Activity, and Anti-Colonial Autoethnography: Stories and Ways of Being.
RuPaulโs Drag Race (RPDR) is a reality television show where drag queensโperformers, who are typically but not always men, that dress up as glamourous and often overstated womenโcontend for the title of โAmericaโs Next Drag Superstarโ and a $100,000 cash prize. In each episode, the queens compete in challenges that involve activities such as acting, sewing, dancing, comedy, and singing. The two queens who do the worst in the challenge that week compete in a lip-sync โsmackdownโ to a song chosen by RuPaulโthe creator, co-producer and main judge of the show, who also is a drag queenโwith the loser being eliminated from the show. The competition continues like this weekly until only four contestants remain, at which point they participate in a final challenge for the crown. The popularity of RPDR is evidenced by the fact it has spawned a variety of spin-offs in multiple countries.
RPDR is a pressure-filled competition with high stakes. The judges ask the contestants on the show to perform, labour, and risk their bodies in ways similar to athletes. The sport-like nature of RPDR is displayed prominently when we consider how the drag queens on the show are encouraged to play through pain and injury.
Athletes risk their bodies and play through injury because of a culture of risk in sport, where the sporting community (athletes, coaches, fans, management) rewards athletes who take risks and alienates those who do not. For instance, when athletes put their bodies at risk by making an impressive tackle on the field or hit on the ice, the fans erupt in cheer. The sporting community views injury as a masculinizing experience, where they tend to respect and idealize the athletes willing to play through injury and risk their bodies. In contrast, the sporting community will alienate and ridicule athletes who are unwilling to participate in this culture of risk. For instance, a study by researchers at McGill University who interviewed retired National Hockey League athletes who had left hockey due to concussions, reported that athletes were alienated and ridiculed by coaches and teammates for speaking up about their injuries or sitting out after a concussion. Given these cultural norms associated with sport, we see athletes risk their bodies and play through injury to maintain and assert the masculinity that the sporting community idealizes and values and to avoid alienation and ridicule. Notably, a similar dynamic exists on RPDR.
On RPDR, the community (judges, contestants, fans) similarly idealizes and values the drag queens willing to risk their bodies and play through injury, while alienating and ridiculing those unwilling to do so. For example, on season 9 episode 2 of RPDR there is a cheerleading competition where the queens partake in a competitive cheer routine, which included tumbling, group choreography, and stunting. Notably, two major injuries take place on this episode. First, competitor Eureka OโHara goes into a jumping split and tears her ACL, yet continues to get up and perform. In the voiceover of this moment, the audience hears Eureka say, โI feel my knee pop, but thereโs no way I was stopping.โ While RuPaul eliminated Eureka three weeks later because of the injury, Eureka is applauded for competing through pain: RuPaul invites her to come back the following season to compete, her fellow queens leave the stage in tears to say goodbye to Eureka after her elimination, and she has a significant fan-following on Instagram (584,000 followers). In this way, Eurekaโs willingness to play through pain is rewarded and idealized by the drag race community.
The second injury on the cheerleading episode, meanwhile, happens to competitor Charlie Hidesโwhen lifting up a fellow queen during practice, Charlie breaks her rib. The following week, Charlie made the decision to not โgive it her allโ during her lip-sync because of this cracked rib. Charlie is ridiculed by her fellow queens and RuPaul because she, unlike Eureka, refused to play through her injury. During a reunion episode, Trinity the Tuck compares Charlie to Eureka, highlighting the value of playing through pain in the competition: โI donโt like this bitch up here [pointing to Eureka], but she injured herself, and if she could do what she did after her knee injury, thereโs no excuse for you [Charlie].โ RuPaul also speaks directly to Charlie, โWhen someone doesnโt give it their all, Iโm disappointed.โ As this example illustrates, just like with athletes, the contestants on RPDR are expected to โgive it their all,โ which includes risking their bodies and playing through injury.
Scholars have often noted that drag is an opportunity for gay men to assert the masculinity typically denied to them in traditional sporting spaces. By playing through injury and risking their bodies for the competition, we see RPDR transform into a sporting space where contestants are able to assert traditional notions of masculinity in a queer space. Often, we hear discourses about athletes that claim the risk and injury are worth the reward (money, fame, contracts). A similar dynamic exists for the drag queens on RPDR, who receive international fame and fortune if they do well on the show and become a fan favorite. However, the problem is that this culture of risk is affective and circulates through sporting bodies and drag queen bodies. Drag is a beautiful art form and an opportunity for gender expression, but there is danger when a culture of risk teaches young queer generations that they need to risk their bodies and compete through injury to succeed.
Niya St. Amant is a Ph.D. Candidate at Queens University. Her research interests focus on risk and injury in sport, typically focusing on concussions and hockey. The full version of her article, where she expands on these notions by conducting a media analysis of season 9 of RPDR, is published online ahead of print in the Sociology of Sport Journal. You can follow her on Twitter @niyastamant.