The temptation to chuck out the old is strong, but can only be part of the answer
As someone who writes books, lectures on teacher training courses and spent 15 years teaching English literature, Iโm often asked what I think should be included in the literary canon or what should replace the existing canon. It feels like a trick question.
First, a definition might be useful. When we say canon weโre referring to an established selection of works that have been dyed into the fabric of British education. Itโs the familiar roll call of names that have featured on the curriculum seemingly for ever, and may well continue to do so. Shakespeare, Wordsworth, Orwell, Blake, Priestley, Owen, Larkin โฆ the parade of (largely) dead white men whom successive generations of British students are invited to meet and grapple with on their academic journeys.
Continue reading...Greenwich University is warning students to prepare themselves for the โtoxic friendshipsโ Jane Austen satirises in her novel
Spoilers โ but does it matter? Now Jane Austenโs Northanger Abbey is identified by a British university as a vehicle for potentially disturbing โgender stereotypesโ and โtoxic relationships and friendshipsโ, perhaps the safest way to approach the satire is, if at all, second hand.
The University of Greenwichโs trigger warning (TW) is for undergraduates, but since the original intention of such alerts was to prepare readers for some possible reminder of upsetting experiences, itโs older ones who should be most grateful for this vigilance. Who, after all, is likely to have squeezed in more toxic relationships or suffered more acutely from gender stereotyping? Can such a novel be considered remotely safe for mature women, even those of us too young to have been jilted by an army captain in a Georgian pump room? Plainly, since Greenwich has stuck a warning on it, not.
Continue reading...