Iโve been online long enough to know that you should copy to the clipboard text youโre about to post as a comment. That way you donโt lose it. Don Presantโs blog ate my comment on this post, so Iโm posting it here.
For context, Brian Mulligan wondered about the burden that employers/institutions face when an application that contains a large number of digital credentials. He wondered whether anyone is working on tools to ease the burden of validating and evaludating the credential.
My response:
Brian, you make good points here โ and ones that have been made before. The problem is that both hiring and Higher Education are broken. And by โbrokenโ (as someone has been through the entire system and has a terminal degree) I mean broken.
So weโre now in a situation where people ask a series of questions to candidates before they look at their CV. This is ostensibly for diversity and unconscious bias (which I fully support) but also because CVs do a terrible job at differentiating between candidates.
Given that many microcredentials simply take existing โchunkyโ credentials such as degrees and diplomas, and break them down into smaller parts, theyโre not solving the problem. Theyโre just allowing universities to make more money by prolonging it.
Instead, we need full-spectrum recognition of individuals. Weโve been at this ever since the start of my career โ first with eportfolios, then with badges, then with blockchain, and now with Verifiable Credentials. The issue is that people mistakenly think itโs the credential, badge, or portfolio that needs to be validated. Itโs not, it the identity of the individual.
Weโre not going to live in a world where everyone has their own domain, sadly, so we need verification systems that allow people to claim and controlled identifiers either publicly or anonymously identify them. If you think about it, you shouldnโt have to apply for jobs, because jobs should come looking for you. I think the systems that are being built now, coupled with some of the AI that Don was talking about, so I think weโre getting closer to solving all of this.
For those dissatisfied with the false dawn of microcredentialing, Iโm working on a โReframing Recognitionโ email course which Iโm hoping to have ready after I get back from holiday. Itโll help people understand why Open Recognition is a much better approach. Come join badges.community to find out why.
The post The old โchicken and eggโ problem about microcredentials kind of misses the point first appeared on Open Thinkering.