FreshRSS

๐Ÿ”’
โŒ About FreshRSS
There are new available articles, click to refresh the page.
Before yesterdayYour RSS feeds

The March of Intellect: Newspaper Cartoons Satirize the Belief in Technological Progress in 1820s England

Before the Industrial Revolution, few had occasion to consider the impact of technology on their lives. A few decades in, however, certain segments of society thought about little else. That, in any case, is the impression given by the debate over what the English press of the early nineteenth century called the โ€œMarch of Intellect,โ€ a label for the apparently polarizing discourse that arose from not just the development of industrial technology but the dissemination of โ€œuseful knowledgeโ€ that followed in its wake. Was this sort of education an engine of progress, or simply of disorder?

The March of Intellectโ€™s most vivid legacy consists of a series of newspaper cartoons published in the eighteen-twenties. They depict a world, as Hunter Dukes writes at the Public Domain Review, where โ€œextravagantly dressed ladies window-shop for pastel finery and forgo stairwells in favor of belt-driven slidesโ€ while โ€œa child is moments away from being paved into the road by a carriage at full gallopโ€; where โ€œmen gorge themselves on pineapples and guzzle bottles at the Champagne Depotโ€ and โ€œpostmen flit around with winged capesโ€; where โ€œeven convicts have it better: they embark for New South Wales on a gargoyle zeppelin, but still have panoramic views.โ€

So far, so Victorian. One could argue more or less in favor of the world described above, as rendered by artist William Heath. But in the future as envisioned in the cartoon at the top of the post by Robert Seymour (now best known as the original illustrator of Charles Dickensโ€™ The Pickwick Papers), the March of Intellect takes on a flamboyantly malign aspect.

In it โ€œa jolly automaton stomps across society,โ€ writes Dukes. โ€œIts head is a literal stack of knowledge โ€” tomes of history, philosophy, and mechanic manuals power two gas-lantern eyes. It wears secular London University as a crown.โ€ It sweeps away โ€œpleas, pleadings, delayed parliamentary bills, and obsolete laws. Vicars, rectors, and quack doctors are turned on their heads.โ€

Nearly two centuries later, most would side instinctively with the participants in the March of Intellect debate who saw the provision of technical and scientific knowledge to then-less-educated groups โ€” women, children, the working class โ€” as an unambiguous good. Yet we may also feel trepidation about the technologies emerging in our own time, when, to name a current example, โ€œartificially intelligent chatbots have fueled ongoing anxieties about the mechanization of intellectual labor.โ€ Every day brings new apocalyptic speculations about the rise of powerful thinking machines running roughshod over humanity. If no artist today is illustrating them quite so entertainingly as Heath and Seymour did, so much the worse for our time.

via Public Domain Review

Related content:

Jules Verne Accurately Predicts What the 20th Century Will Look Like in His Lost Novel, Paris in the Twentieth Century (1863)

How Futurists Envisioned the Future in the 1920s: Moving Walkways, Personal Helicopters, Glass-Domed Cities, Dream Recorders & More

19th Century Caricatures of Charles Darwin, Mark Twain, H.M. Stanley & Other Famous Victorians (1873)

The Charles Dickens Illustrated Gallery: A New Online Collection Presents All of the Original Illustrations from Charles Dickensโ€™ Novels

Based in Seoul,ย Colin Marshallย writes and broadcasts on cities, language, and culture. His projects include the Substack newsletterย Books on Cities,ย the bookย The Stateless City: a Walk through 21st-Century Los Angelesย and the video seriesย The City in Cinema. Follow him on Twitter atย @colinmarshallย or onย Facebook.

โŒ