FreshRSS

๐Ÿ”’
โŒ About FreshRSS
There are new available articles, click to refresh the page.
Before yesterdayYour RSS feeds

Brown University Stitched, c 1786

A nice bit of Brown University history after graduation weekend. The first university presidentโ€™s house was built in 1770 and by 1840 it had been moved and a new house builtโ€“ the current house at Brown and Power is the 4th according to the Encyclopedia Brunonia. Among early images of the university, this needlework by Polly Turner, a student at Mary Balchโ€™s school, is my favorite. Balchโ€™s studentsโ€™ samplers are renowned among collectors and scholars. Her school was at 22 George Street, just down the hill from the library where I work, in a home that was cleared by the mid-19th century to make way for the Dorrance mansion (now Wilbour Hall).

Polly Turner chose to profile the presidentโ€™s house in a glorious burst of color and careful needlework. โ€œHonour and Renown Will the Ingenous Crown,โ€ she heads the piece. The sampler is in the collection at the Cooper Hewitt Museum, which has a short blog about it here.

The post Brown University Stitched, c 1786 appeared first on Karin Wulf.

Women in the history of linguisticsโ€”from marginalization to recognition

"Women in the history of linguisticsโ€”from marginalization to recognition" by Wendy Ayres-Bennett and Helena Sanson, co-editors of "Women in the History of Linguistics" published by Oxford University Press

Women in the history of linguisticsโ€”from marginalization to recognition

Womenโ€™s History Month raises issues of erasure and marginalization, authority and power which, sadly, are still relevant for women today. Much can be learnt from the experience of women in the past. We find inspiring stories of women who overcame prejudice and constraints of all kinds and who sometimes managed to gain recognition from their peers, only to be excluded from the history of their discipline.ย 

In the field of linguistics, this marginalization relates to some extent to what is today considered part of linguistics and the current valuing above all of theoretical work. Words matter: a broader definition of linguistics allows women across the centuries to be included in this scholarly field. Given the cultural and practical limitations imposed on their access to education across all cultures, we need to look outside more institutionalized and traditional frameworks to discover the contributions made by women to the study of language structure and function.

โ€œWords matter: a broader definition of linguistics allows women across the centuries to be included in this scholarly field.โ€

Classic histories of linguistics, very rarely, if ever, include women scholars. We set about uncovering the contribution of women linguistsโ€”from European and non-European traditionsโ€” and their ideas and writings to give them the recognition they deserve. A group of equally motivated and determined scholars joined us in our quest. We looked for names, works and ideas, especially in those liminal spaces not reached by official historiography, that is, outside institutions, universities, and academies in more private and domesticated spaces. We decided to challenge categories and concepts devised for male-dominated accounts and expands our field of enquiry: we turned our attention not only to pioneers and exceptional women, but also to those non-exceptional women who nevertheless quietly moved forward our knowledge of languages, their description, analysis, codification and acquisition. Painstaking research in archives and libraries, looking at manuscripts and printed sources, gradually unearthed rich, fascinating, and often unexpected evidence of womenโ€™s contribution.ย 

For the earlier periods, it was difficult to find women who published grammars or dictionaries, but they did exist. Marguerite Buffet in seventeenth-century France wrote a volume of observations on the good usage of French specifically aimed at women (Nouvelles observations sur la langue franรงoise, 1668). Similarly, in 1740, Johanna Corleva published a Dutch translation of Port-Royalโ€™s celebrated general and rational grammar. In Portugal, in 1786, Francisca de Chantal รlvares produced a compendium of Portuguese grammar for female pupils in convent schools,ย the Breve Compendio da Gramatica Portugueza para uso das Meninas que se educaรต no Mosteiro da Vizitaรงaรต de Lisboa, at a time when the majority of women did not have access to formal education. Further afield, women missionaries were also active in the field. Gertrud von Massenbach joined the Sudan Pioneer Mission in 1909, as a teacher of mathematics in Aswan, in Nubian territory. Her linguistic interests led her to publish a dictionary with a grammatical introduction of Kunรปzi Nubian (Wรถrterbuch des nubischen Kunรปzi-Dialektes mit einer grammatischen Einleitung, 1933) and a collection of Nubian texts (Nubische Texte im Dialekt der Kunuzi und der Dongolawi, 1962).

โ€œWe need to look outside more institutionalized and traditional frameworks to discover the contributions made by women to the study of language.โ€

But there is much more. Women were, for instance, the intended audience or dedicatees of some of the earlier vernacular grammars in Europe. Theย Gramรกtica de la lengua castellanaย (1492) by Antonio de Nebrija, the very first printed grammar of a vernacular language in Europe, was commissioned by Queen Isabella I of Castile and, according to Juan de Valdรฉs, was meant to be of benefit, โ€œpara las damas de la serenรญssima doรฑa Isabelโ€ (โ€œfor the ladies-in-waiting of Her Very Serene Highness Queen Isabelโ€). Women were translators, language teachers, collectors of data on endangered languages, and creators of new scripts. In Jiangyong county (Jiฤngyว’ng xiร n) of Hunan (Hรบnรกn) province in China, a rural territory surrounded by mountains, the nวšshลซ script (โ€œfemale script/writingโ€) was used and transmitted among village women for at least one and a half centuries: a variant of the Chinese script, it represents a significant example of Chinese womenโ€™s contribution to character invention and development.ย 

Women also assisted male members of their families, or male colleagues, in their work as linguists. Lucy Catherine Lloyd (1834-1914), the sister-in-law of the German linguist Wilhelm Bleek, was his most important collaborator. Together they created the nineteenth-century archive of ว€Xam and !Kung texts (today called the Digital Bleek and Lloyd), an invaluable resource for linguists working on Khoisan languages. Cinie Louw followed her husband Andrew Louw to South Rhodesia (today Zimbabwe) to work on the Morgenster Mission, learning the local language, Karanga, a Shona dialect, and becoming a fluent speaker. Their 1919 translation of the Bible into Karanga was a joint effort, preceded in 1915, by an important manual of the Chikaranga Language.ย 

Other womenโ€™s linguistic work has been neglected or overshadowed, the men with whom they collaborated reaping the benefit of their efforts. The young Chiri Yukie (1903โ€“1922) helped codify the oral tradition of the Ainu people of Hokkaido in northern Japan. Thanks to her bilingual and bicultural knowledge she was able to collect a wide range of oral performances, preserving them for posterity and making them accessible by translating them into Japanese. Her invaluable work ultimately ended up promoting, instead, the career of a prominent male academic who was awarded the Imperial prize for his work on the Indigenous language.ย 

โ€œWomenโ€™s personal and professional life cannot be separated in a way that has been possible for male scholars across the centuries.โ€

What came to light, piece by piece, through reading their personal stories, was the challenges women had to face in male-dominated academia. Womenโ€™s personal and professional life cannot be separated in a way that has been possible for male scholars across the centuries. Theirs are often tales of perseverance and determination. Take the example of Mary Haas, a stalwart of twentieth-century American Indian Linguistics and a central figure in the Boas-Sapir tradition, which laid the foundation for current language documentation practices. Haas found her marriage in 1931 to Morris Swadesh limited her opportunities both within linguistics and with respect to employment generally. Given the scarcity of academic appointments, she considered getting a teaching certificate to teach in public schools in Oklahoma to support herself and her fieldwork on Native American languages. However, as a married woman she was unlikely to get hired in a public school. Undeterred, she wrote to Swadesh asking for a divorce so that she might be able to support herself. Swadesh agreed. Their divorce was meant to allow Haas to pursue more avenues of employment, although her plans were ultimately interrupted by World War II.ย 

Uncovering such stories proved complicated, but extremely rewarding. And the more we found, the more we have become convinced that there is still so much more to discover.

Read a free chapter fromย Women in the History of Linguisticsย on Oxford Academic.

Featured image from the cover ofย Women in the History of Linguisticsย byย Wendy Ayres-Bennettย and Helena Sanson.

OUPblog - Academic insights for the thinking world.

โŒ