Most daily stand-up meetings make whatever theyโre trying to solve worse as a result of eating up team time and focus.
First, letโs look at real meeting math. The daily stand-up isnโt just the 15-30 minutes of the stand-up โ when we talk about meetings, we also need to include the prep, post, and slack time. That stand-up meeting eats up at least one hour of teammate time โ so if you have five teammates, thatโs at least 5 hours of team time.ย
Five hours of team time per day per week adds up; given that the average knowledge worker makes ~$30 per hour, thatโs $3,000 per month in wages for just this meeting, for five people.
Should you still decide to do daily stand-ups, despite knowing this, hereโs what not to do:
Hereโs what TO do:
As I write in Team Habits, most bad or counterproductive meetings are a result of other poor team habits. If your teamโs habits around decision-making, prioritization, and collaboration arenโt working, youโll end up having a lot of crutch meetings to address those issues.ย
But crutch meetings cost your teamโs most precious resources: their time and their attention.
This means that often, the best way to fix bad meeting culture isnโt just to work on improving meetings, and adding new ones. Itโs by starting with the root issue with your team habits, that is, working on decision-making, planning, communication, so that the endless unproductive meetings wonโt need to keep happening.ย
Iโll turn it over to you: if youโre doing daily stand-ups, what are the root challenges or (bad) team habits that are creating the need for the daily stand-ups?
The post Does Your Team Really Need a Daily Stand-Up Meeting? appeared first on Productive Flourishing.
Status update meetings are ones where no decisions are made and no forward planning takes place. As such, they can be considered superfluous to well-run organisations and effective collaborations. There are better ways to manage people and projects.
I find that status update meetings are a bad habit that organisations get into for one of several reasons. It could be that they donโt know better. With these kinds of organisations, working with WAO and organisations like us can be a revelation. In fact, thatโs been the case many times, especially with smaller charities.
Another reason for the status update meeting can be a lack of standardised toolset. In these kinds of organisations, everyone uses their own โto-doโ list, from pen and paper through to some complicated digital workflow. The status update meeting therefore acts as an inefficient kind of โAPIโ (or translation) between these siloed systems.
A third reason that status update meetings exist is that people are employed to work fixed hours. This is the most pernicious. It might not even be a conscious thought, but if youโve got hours to fill, thereโs nothing as low-bar as a status update meeting to while away the time.
The easiest way to get out of the habit of status updates is to know what the alternative is, to decide on a standardised toolset, and to turn those meetings into co-working sessions.
At WAO we used the simplest tools possible to get the job done. Over-complicated toolsets and workflows are the enemy of collaboration and, in fact, can be thought of as a form of procrastination.
Essentially, all you need is a place to put three lists: To Do, Doing, and Done. If youโre physically co-located this could even be on a wall. WAO uses Trello as we find it everyone just โgetsโ it. You can add extra lists as necessary (we use โEpicsโ, โFeedbackโ, and โZombie Gardenโ).
What this means is that status update-related conversations happen on the Trello board. The meetings that used to happen to keep everyone up-to-date can now either be eliminated or turned into co-working meetings.
At WAO, we have at least one co-working meeting per client every week. In these meetings we check in, bringing our full selves to work, prioritise what needs doing, and then either work on those things together, or divide and conquer. As weโre fully-remote, the latter looks like muting audio and video for a set period of time (usually 15, 30, or 45 minutes) and working on a task. We can can unmute and ask questions if necessary.
The above can sound like it might drain the fun out of work. I can assure you itโs the opposite. Status update meetings drain energy out of people and projects. Co-working and representing progress visually is invigorating.
Try it! You might be surprised.
The post Iโm pretty sure โstatus updateโ meetings arenโt work first appeared on Open Thinkering.