Imagine weโre all surfers. The ocean weโre in is the educational system, and weโre all trying to ride the wave of knowledge to the shore of understanding. Some of us have master surfers as guides โ personal tutors who are right there with us, helping us manoeuvre the currents and ride high on the knowledge wave. They know our strengths, they know our fears, and they ensure we donโt wipe out. These fortunate few reach the shore faster, more smoothly and often with a lot more fun.
Then there are the rest of us. Weโre in a giant surf class. Thereโs one instructor and dozens of us learners. The instructor is doing their best, but they canโt give us all the personalised attention we need. Some of us catch the wave, some of us donโt. This is Bloomโs Two Sigma Problem.
Brought to the fore by educational psychologist Benjamin Bloom in the 1980s, the Two Sigma Problem highlights a gap in education. Personal tutoring can propel studentsโ performance by two standard deviations โ like moving from the middle of a class right to the top 2%. The problem is, we canโt give everyone a personal tutor. Itโs just not feasible. So, the question is, how do we give each student the benefits of one-on-one instruction, at scale?
Enter Artificial Intelligence (AI) and, in particular, Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT. Iโve been experimenting with using ChatGPT as a tutor for my son during the revision period for his exams. Itโs great at coming up with questions, marking them, and suggesting how to improve. This kind of feedback is absolutely crucial to learning. Itโs also great at exploring the world and allowing curiosity to take you in new directions.
So, if we revisit the Two Sigma Problem based on whatโs possible with LLMs, it looks like thereโs a possible solution with multiple advantages:
No technology is a silver bullet. As an educator, I know that while curiosity and feedback is really important, thereโs nothing like another human providing emotional input โ including motivation. AI is here to support, not replace, our human guides.
Even though itโs early days, weโre already seeing some really interesting developments in the application of LLMs in education. Iโm no fan of Microsoft, but I will acknowledge that a feature they have in development called โpassage generationโ looks interesting. This tool reviews data to create personalised reading passages based on the words or phonics rules a student finds most challenging. Educators can customise the passage, selecting suggested practice words and generating options, then publish the passage as a new reading assignment. I find this kind of thing really useful in Duolingo for learning Spanish. Context matters.
As a former teacher, I know how important prioritisation can be for the limited amount of time you have with each student. And as a parent, Iโm a big believer in the power of deliberate practice for getting better at all kinds of things. Freeing up teachers to be more like coaches than instructors has been the dream ever since someone came up with the pithy phrase โguide on the side, not sage on the stageโ.
One of the main concerns I think a lot people have with AI in general is that it will โsteal our jobsโ. Iโd point out here that the main problem here isnโt AI, itโs capitalism. Any tool or system be used for good or for ill. If youโre not sure how we can approach this post-scarcity world, Iโd recommend reading Fully Automated Luxury Communism by Aaron Bastani. Of course, regulation is and should be an issue, too.
The main issue I see with this is centralised LLMs run by companies running opaque models and beholden to shareholders. Thatโs why I envisage educational institutions running local LLMs, or at least within a network that only connects to the internet when it needs to. Just as Google Desktop used to allow you to search through your local machine and the web, I can imagine us all having an AI assistant that has full context, while preserving our privacy.
So the way to approach any new tool or service is to ask critical questions such as โwho benefits?โ but also to fully explore whatโs possible with all of this. Iโm hugely hopeful that AI wonโt lead us into a sci-fi dystopia, but rather help to even out the playing field when it comes to human learning and flourishing.
What do you think? Iโd love to hear in the comments!
Image remixed from an original on the SkillUp blog. Text written with the help of ChatGPT (itโs particularly good at coming up with metaphors, Iโve found!)
The post Using AI to help solve Bloomโs Two Sigma Problem first appeared on Open Thinkering.Avi Staiman discusses the value that ChatGPT can bring to scholarly communication, particularly leveling the playing field for English as an Additional Language authors.
The post Guest Post โ Academic Publishers Are Missing the Point on ChatGPT appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.
A compilation of links and a video to incisive analyses of ChatGPT and what it means for the future.
The post Thinking About ChatGPT and the Future โ Where Are We On AIโs Development Curve? appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.